Brilliant DPI Inc v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. et al
Filing
142
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/24/2023, GRANTING 139 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Brilliant DPI shall respond to the motion to reopen no later than September 13, 2023. Any reply shall be filed no later than September 27, 2023. Before the court can substitute CIT Technology Financing Services, LLC for CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc. and reopen the case, the court must confirm that it has jurisdiction. Because the action is before the court on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the court must confirm that complete diversity exists between the parties. Therefore, no later than September 13, 2023, CIT Technology Financing Services, LLC shall file a statement establishing the citizenship of CIT Technology Financing Services, LLC. (cc: all counsel)(mlm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
BRILLIANT DPI INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 18-CV-799
KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, U.S.A., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
On March 3, 2022, the court granted the parties’ stipulated motion for dismissal
and dismissed this action. In doing so, the court stated, “Pursuant to the terms of the
Settlement Agreement between the parties, CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc.
(n/k/a CIT Technology Financing Services, LLC) shall have the right to reopen this
action and obtain entry of a stipulated judgment (as defined in paragraphs 2-3 of the
Settlement Agreement).” (ECF No. 136.)
On August 23, 2023, CIT Technology Financing Services, LLC filed a motion
alleging that Brilliant DPI breached the settlement agreement by failing to make
monthly payments. That assertion was not supported by any affidavit or other
evidence. CIT also asks the court to reopen the case and substitute it for its predecessor,
CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc.
Attorney George S. Peek concurrently filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for
Brilliant DPI. (ECF No. 139.) Counsel’s motion was unnecessary because multiple
attorneys have appeared on behalf of Brilliant DPI and at least one of those attorneys—
Attorney Andrew R. Rider—will continue to represent the plaintiff. See Civ. L.R.
7.1(e)(1). Nonetheless, the motion is granted.
Brilliant DPI shall respond to the motion to reopen no later than September 13,
2023. Any reply shall be filed no later than September 27, 2023.
Further, before the court can substitute CIT Technology Financing Services, LLC
for CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc. and reopen the case, the court must confirm
that it has jurisdiction. Because the action is before the court on diversity of citizenship,
28 U.S.C. § 1332, the court must confirm that complete diversity exists between the
parties. Therefore, no later than September 13, 2023, CIT Technology Financing
Services, LLC shall file a statement establishing the citizenship of CIT Technology
Financing Services, LLC.
SO ORDERED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 24th day of August, 2023.
_________________________
WILLIAM E. DUFFIN
U.S. Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?