Johnson v. Kind et al
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 10/4/2021 that Johnson may proceed on a retaliation claim against Swiekatowski and an additional due process claim against Wickman. FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to an informal service agreement between the W isconsin DOJ and this Court, copies of Johnson's complaint, the screening order, and this order are being electronically served on William Swiekatowski and that Swiekatowski shall file a responsive pleading within 60 days of this order. FURTHE R ORDERED that Defendants John Kind and Andrew Wickman's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Johnson's motion for an extension of the discovery deadline (Dkt. No. 42) is GRANTED. Discovery to be completed no later than December 6, 2021. Motions for summary judgment due no later than January 5, 2022. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(kmm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL S. JOHNSON,
v.
Plaintiff,
Case No. 19-cv-0972-bhl
JOHN KIND, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff Michael S. Johnson is representing himself in this 42 U.S.C. §1983 action. The
Court screened the complaint and allowed Johnson to proceed on due process claims against
Defendants John Kind and Andrew Wickman. The Court also concluded that, while Johnson stated
a retaliation claim against William Swiekatowski and an additional due process claim against
Wickman, those claims are barred by Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 468 (1997). Dkt. No. 7
at 8, 10. On September 24, 2021, the Court invited the parties to address the application of
Edwards. On October 1, 2021, the parties agreed that Edwards does not bar the retaliation and
additional due process claims. Dkt. Nos. 41, 43.
Accordingly, the Court will allow Johnson to proceed on a retaliation claim against
Swiekatowski and a due process claim against Wickman in connection with the second disciplinary
hearing. See Dkt. No. 7 at 7-8, 9-10. Swiekatowski and Wickman shall respond to Johnson’s
complaint. 1 Because Kind and Wickman’s counsel will also represent Swiekatowski and to keep
this case moving, the Court will set a discovery deadline of December 6, 2021 (that means that the
parties must serve their requests at least thirty days before the deadline to allow the opposing party
sufficient time under the rules to respond by the deadline). Defendants may conduct an additional
deposition of Johnson to address the new claims. The parties may request an extension of the
Wickman filed his answer to Johnson’s complaint on December 4, 2020. In light of the Court’s decision to allow
Johnson to proceed on an additional claim against Wickman, the Court will give him an opportunity to file an amended
answer. He does not have to file an amended answer if he believes his original answer is sufficient.
1
discovery deadline if they believe they need more time to complete discovery on the new claims.
For the sake of efficiency, the Court will deny without prejudice Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment and will set a new dispositive motion deadline of January 5, 2022.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Johnson may proceed on a retaliation claim against
Swiekatowski and an additional due process claim against Wickman as described in the Court’s
screening order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to an informal service agreement between
the Wisconsin Department of Justice and this Court, copies of Johnson’s complaint, the screening
order, and this order are being electronically served on William Swiekatowski.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the informal service agreement between
the Wisconsin Department of Justice and this Court, Swiekatowski shall file a responsive pleading
to the complaint within sixty days of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants John Kind and Andrew Wickman’s
motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Johnson’s motion for an extension of the discovery
deadline (Dkt. No. 42) is GRANTED. Parties must serve their discovery requests by a date
sufficiently early so that discovery is completed no later than December 6, 2021. Parties may file
motions for summary judgment, together with supporting materials, no later than January 5, 2022.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin on October 4, 2021.
s/ Brett H. Ludwig
BRETT H. LUDWIG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?