Jiles v. Hoerl et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 58 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(asc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JOSEPH F. JILES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-CV-1111 DR. SARAH HOERL et al., Defendants. ORDER On May 18, 2021, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the merits. (ECF No. 58.) On May 19, 2021, the court issued an order notifying pro se plaintiff Joseph F. Jiles that he had until June 21, 2021 to file a response to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 70.) The court warned Jiles that if he failed to file a response or ask for more time to file a response, the court would accept all facts asserted by the defendants as undisputed, which would likely result in summary judgment being granted in the defendants’ favor and the case being dismissed. The June 21, 2021 deadline has passed, and Jiles still has not filed a response. As such, the court will construe the motion as unopposed. The court has reviewed the defendants’ motion, brief in support, and the undisputed facts, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(2), and concludes that the defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the merits. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 58) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court will enter judgment accordingly. This order and the judgment to follow are final. A dissatisfied party may appeal this court’s decision to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit by filing in this court a notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of judgment. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3, 4. This court may extend this deadline if a party timely requests an extension and shows good cause or excusable neglect for not being able to meet the 30-day deadline. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A). Under certain circumstances, a party may ask this court to alter or amend its judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or ask for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Any motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) must be filed within 28 days of the entry of judgment. The court cannot extend this deadline. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(2). Any motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) must be filed within a reasonable time, generally no more than one year after the entry of the judgment. The court cannot extend this deadline. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(2). 2 A party is expected to closely review all applicable rules and determine what, if any, further action is appropriate. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 15th day of July, 2021. BY THE COURT: NANCY JOSEPH United States Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?