Carter v. Edwards
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/30/2020 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Tommie L Carter at Green Bay Correctional Institution)(jm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
TOMMIE L. CARTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
SIEANNA EDWARDS,
Case No. 20-CV-648-JPS
ORDER
Defendant.
On April 24, 2020, Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a
complaint alleging that on April 21, 2020, his constitutional rights were
violated at Green Bay Correctional Facility. (Docket #1). Before this case
proceeds any further, the Court must dismiss it because it is clear from the
face of the complaint that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative
remedies.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) establishes that, prior to
filing a lawsuit complaining about prison conditions, a prisoner must
exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available[.]” 42 U.S.C. §
1997e(a). To do so, the prisoner must “file complaints and appeals in the
place, and at the time, the prison’s administrative rules require,” and he
must do so precisely in accordance with those rules; substantial compliance
does not satisfy the PLRA. Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1025 (7th Cir.
2002); Burrell v. Powers, 431 F.3d 282, 284–85 (7th Cir. 2005). A suit must be
dismissed if it was filed before exhaustion was complete, even if exhaustion
is achieved before judgment is entered. Perez v. Wis. Dep’t of Corr., 182 F.3d
532, 535 (7th Cir. 1999).
Case 2:20-cv-00648-JPS Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 3 Document 3
The Wisconsin Department of Corrections maintains an Inmate
Complaint Review System (“ICRS”) to provide a forum for administrative
complaints. Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 310.04. There are two steps an inmate
must take to exhaust their administrative remedies under the ICRS. First,
the inmate must file an offender complaint with the Institution Complaint
Examiner (“ICE”) within fourteen days of the events giving rise to the
complaint. Id. § DOC 310.07(2). The ICE may reject the complaint or return
the complaint to the inmate and allow him or her to correct the issue(s) and
re-file within ten days. See id. § DOC 310.10(5),(6). If the complaint is
rejected, the inmate may appeal the rejection to the appropriate reviewing
authority within ten days. Id. § DOC 310.10(10). If the complaint is not
rejected, the ICE issues a recommendation for disposing of the complaint,
either dismissal or affirmance, to the reviewing authority. Id. § DOC
310.10(9),(12). The reviewing authority will affirm or dismiss the complaint
in whole or in part, or return the complaint to the ICE for further
investigation. Id. § DOC 310.11(2).
Second, if the ICE recommends dismissal and the reviewing
authority accepts it, the inmate may appeal the decision to the Corrections
Complaint Examiner (“CCE”) within fourteen days. Id. §§ DOC 310.09(1),
310.12. The CCE issues a recommendation to the Secretary of the
Department of Corrections who may accept or reject it. Id. §§ DOC 310.12(2),
310.13. Upon receiving the Secretary’s decision, or after ninety days from
the date the Secretary received the recommendation, the inmate’s
administrative remedies are exhausted. Id. § DOC 310.13(4).
A mere three days had passed between the alleged violation and the
filing of the federal complaint. That is not enough time for an inmate
complaint examiner to respond to an inmate’s complaint, much less for
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:20-cv-00648-JPS Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 3 Document 3
Plaintiff to appeal the determination. Plaintiff must exhaust his
administrative remedies before seeking recourse in federal court.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that this case be and the same is hereby
DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his
administrative remedies.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 30th day of April, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
J.P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge
Page 3 of 3
Case 2:20-cv-00648-JPS Filed 04/30/20 Page 3 of 3 Document 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?