SUOJA, DELORES AGNES v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.
Filing
63
ORDER vacating Order 61 . Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/18/15. (jat)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY SUOJA, individually and as
special administrator for the estate
of Oswald F. Suoja,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
99-cv-475-bbc
v.
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BARBARA CONNELL, individually and
as special administrator for the estate of
Daniel Connell,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
05-cv-219-bbc
v.
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On January 8, 2015, defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc. filed three motions to exclude
different types of expert evidence that it believed plaintiffs Gary Suoja and Barbara Connell
intended to offer at trial. In response, a briefing schedule was set in accordance with the
court’s procedure on nondispositive motions. When plaintiffs did not respond by the
1
deadline, I granted defendant’s motion as unopposed.
Since that order was docketed, it has come to my attention that, in May 2014, the
parties agreed to their own briefing schedule on any evidentiary motions, giving plaintiffs
a February 20, 2015 deadline to file a response and giving defendant a March 16, 2015
deadline to reply. Magistrate Stephen Crocker approved that agreement in August 2014.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the January 8, 2015 order in these cases (dkt. #61 in
case no. 99-cv-475-bbc and dkt. #45 in case no. 05-cv-219-bbc) is VACATED. In the
future, if the parties receive a briefing schedule from the court that is inconsistent with a
previous scheduling order, they should contact the court promptly to identify the
discrepancy.
Entered this 18th day of February, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?