LEE, DONALD v. COPSEY, MR.

Filing 71

ORDER denying 70 MOTION to waive or reduce monthly payments of the unpaid balance of the the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/26/09. (elc),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DONALD LEE, P l a i n t i f f, v. 0 1 -c v -1 9 7 -jc s JO N LITSCHER, GERALD BERGE, et.al. D e fe n d a n t s . ORD ER O n August 4, 2009, plaintiff Donald Lee filed a motion for return of fees in this case. H e also asks for the fees to be returned in three other cases that are not pending in this cou rt. In his letter, plaintiff objects to the institution's procedure in collecting his filing fees b e c a u s e he has no money left in his account for hygiene items. I will construe plaintiff's letter as a motion to waive or reduce his monthly payments of the unpaid balance of his filing fee in this case. The motion must be denied. U nder the Prison Litigation Reform Act, an inmate who files a lawsuit in federal court under the in forma pauperis statute must pay the statutory filing fee, first by making an initial partial payment and then by sending the remainder of the fee to the court in in st a llm e nts of 20% of the preceding month's income in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 19 1 5 (b )( 2 ). If the prisoner then files additional complaints or appeals, the amount owed increases as well. Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), rev'd on other gro un ds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000) and Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 62 6 (7th Cir. 2000). Using the formula described above, plaintiff is currently required to pay 20% of his monthly income until the remaining balance for this case is paid in full. C o u rt records reflect that petitioner has an outstanding balance of $31.16. In his motion, plaintiff says prison officials are taking100% of his income to pay the filing fees he owes for this case, other federal court filing fees, state court filing fees and legal loa ns. He says that he cannot afford necessary items such as a toothbrush and shower shoes. Although I appreciate plaintiff's frustrations with being unable to purchase hygiene products, th is court is bound by the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. I have no discretion to modify the method in which the fees for filing these cases are collected. T herefore, I must deny plaintiff's motion to waive or reduce his monthly payments. OR DER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to waive or reduce his monthly payments of the unpaid balance of his filing fee in this case, dkt. #70, is DENIED. Entered this 26th day of August, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?