GAIMAN, NEIL v. MCFARLANE, TODD

Filing 349

FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of plaintiffs declaring that plaintiff Neil Gaiman is a joint 50% owner of the copyrights to the publications Spawn issues 9 and 26 and Angela issues 1, 2 and 3 and the content of those publications, with the respective future rights and obligations of the parties with respect hereto being resolved under the terms of their settlement agreement. All remaining claims and counterclaims dismissed with prejudice. (BBC/PAO) (arw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NEIL GAIMAN and MARVELS AND MIRACLES, LLC, FINAL JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 02-cv-48-bbc TODD McFARLANE, TODD McFARLANE PRODUCTIONS, INC., TMP INTERNATIONAL, INC., McFARLANE WORLDWIDE, INC. and IMAGE COMICS, INC., Defendants. This action came for consideration before the court with District Judge Barbara B. Crabb presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs and against the McFarlane defendants declaring that plaintiff Neil Gaiman is a joint 50% owner of the copyrights to the publications Spawn issues 9 and 26 and Angela issues 1, 2 and 3 and the content of those publications, with the respective future rights and obligations of the parties with respect hereto being resolved under the terms of their settlement agreement. IT IS FURTHER 0 RDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered dismissing all remaining claims and counterclaims with prejudice, the parties having waived in their settlement agreement any right of appeal with respect to any such claims or counterclaims. All parties are to bear their own attorney fees and costs. Approved as to form this ~ ~~~4~" h- e.. day of February, 2012. __~ Barbara B. Crabb District Judge ~+~~ Peter Oppeneer Clerk of Court I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?