Gaiman, Neil v. McFarlane, Todd
Filing
349
FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of plaintiffs declaring that plaintiff Neil Gaiman is a joint 50% owner of the copyrights to the publications Spawn issues 9 and 26 and Angela issues 1, 2 and 3 and the content of those publications, with the respective future rights and obligations of the parties with respect hereto being resolved under the terms of their settlement agreement. All remaining claims and counterclaims dismissed with prejudice. (BBC/PAO) (arw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
NEIL GAIMAN and
MARVELS AND MIRACLES, LLC,
FINAL
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 02-cv-48-bbc
TODD McFARLANE, TODD
McFARLANE PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
TMP INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
McFARLANE WORLDWIDE, INC.
and IMAGE COMICS, INC.,
Defendants.
This action came for consideration before the court with District Judge
Barbara B. Crabb presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has been
rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs
and against the McFarlane defendants declaring that plaintiff Neil Gaiman is a joint
50% owner of the copyrights to the publications Spawn issues 9 and 26 and Angela issues
1, 2 and 3 and the content of those publications, with the respective future rights and
obligations of the parties with respect hereto being resolved under the terms of their
settlement agreement.
IT IS FURTHER 0 RDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered dismissing
all remaining claims and counterclaims with prejudice, the parties having waived in their
settlement agreement any right of appeal with respect to any such claims or counterclaims.
All parties are to bear their own attorney fees and costs.
Approved as to form this ~
~~~4~"
h- e..
day of February, 2012.
__~
Barbara B. Crabb
District Judge
~+~~
Peter Oppeneer
Clerk of Court
I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?