USA v. HEINRICH, PAUL A.

Filing 219

ORDER denying defendant Paul Heinrich's 218 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/3/2018. (jef),(ps)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL A. HEINRICH and CHARLES VOGEL
ENTERPRISES, INC.

03-cv-75-jdp

Defendants.
I denied the motion by defendant Paul A. Heinrich to dissolve the injunction and
reopen this case. Dkt. 217. Heinrich has filed a motion for reconsideration. Dkt. 218. Heinrich
has again made this filing with a cover letter suggesting that I should consider the matter before
it is filed publicly. I decline to keep his motion from the public record of this case.
A motion for reconsideration serves the limited purposes of correcting manifest errors
of law or fact, or presenting new evidence that could not have been presented the first time
around. Oto v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 224 F.3d 601, 606 (7th Cir. 2000). Heinrich’s motion for
reconsideration just reiterates his arguments about why his case should be reopened, and
contends that I was wrong to deny his original motion. This is a basis for an appeal, not a
motion for reconsideration.

ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that defendant Paul Heinrich’s motion for reconsideration, Dkt. 218,
is DENIED.
Entered October 3, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge

2