HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOOGLE INC.

Filing 158

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney and to Terminate Representation of Plaintiffs by Plaintiffs HYPERPHRASE INC., HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.Response due by 9/25/2009. (Amundsen, Jennifer)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and HYPERPHRASE INC., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 06-C-0199-BBC COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND TO TERMINATE REPRESENTATION OF PLAINTIFFS Raymond P. Niro of the law firm Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, and Kim Grimmer and Jennifer L. Amundsen of the law firm Solheim Billing & Grimmer S.C., attorneys for plaintiffs Hyperphrase Technologies, LLC and Hyperphrase Inc. (collectively, "Hyperphrase"), hereby request permission to withdraw as counsel for Hyperphrase in the above-captioned civil action and to immediately terminate further representation of the plaintiffs in such action. Permission to withdraw is sought because plaintiffs Hyperphrase have placed their attorneys in a position that has made it impossible for them to fulfill their professional responsibilities to plaintiffs and this Court because of a lack of availability and cooperation. Further, Solheim Billing & Grimmer S.C. and Mr. Grimmer and Ms. Amundsen were engaged directly by Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro as local counsel solely for the purposes of assisting in the filing of documents with the Court and providing advice and counsel as to local practices. They do not have 1 expertise in patent matters that would allow them to competently represent Hyperphrase after the withdrawal of Mr. Niro and Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro. Solheim Billing & Grimmer, S.C., has had no direct contact with representatives of the plaintiff. The majority of its work on this matter has been limited to advising the Niro firm on local practice and ensuring that pleadings were properly filed and served on the defense counsel. They should be allowed to withdraw for these additional reasons. A copy of this motion has been provided to Hyperphrase and Hyperphrase has been assured that the below listed counsel will cooperate in any transition with successor counsel. For the reasons stated, it is respectfully requested that this motion be granted. Dated: September 18, 2009 Respectfully submitted, s/Jennifer L. Amundsen Kim Grimmer Jennifer L. Amundsen Solheim Billing & Grimmer S.C. U.S. Bank Plaza, Suite 301 One South Pinckney Street Madison, Wisconsin 53701-1644 (608) 282-1200 Fax: (608) 282-1218 Raymond P. Niro NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO 181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 236-0733 Fax: (312) 236-3137 Attorneys for Hyperphrase Technologies, LLC and Hyperphrase, Inc. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 18th of September 2009, a true and correct copy of COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND TO TERMINATE REPRESENTATION OF PLAINTIFFS was filed with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF filing system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Frank E. Scherkenbach Fish & Richardson P.C. 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110-2804 (858) 678-5070 Fax: (858) 678-5099 Scherkenbach@fr.com Jason W. Wolff Fish & Richardson P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego California 92130 (858) 678-5070 Fax: (858) 678-5099 wolff@fr.com Attorneys for Google, Inc. James A. Friedman James D. Peterson Hannah L. Renfro Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. One East Main Street P.O. Box 2719 Madison, Wisconsin 53701-2719 (608) 257-3911 Fax: (608) 257-0609 jfriedman@gklaw.com jpeterson@gklaw.com hrenfro@gklaw.com s/Jennifer L. Amundsen 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?