HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOOGLE INC.

Filing 162

ORDER granting 158 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorneys Raymond P. Niro, Jennifer L Amundsen, and Kim Grimmer terminated Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/5/09. (rep)

Download PDF
HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOOGLE INC. Doc. 162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------H Y PER PH R A S E TECHNOLOGIES, L L C and HYPERPHRASE INC., ORDER P l a i n t i ff s , 0 6 - cv -1 9 9 - b b c v. G O O G L E INC., D efendan t. --------------------------------------------C ou nsel for plaintiffs have moved to withdraw from their representation because they h ave been unable to communicate with plaintiffs' representative. At a hearing held on S eptem ber 22, 2009, with counsel for both parties, I gave defendant Google until September 22 , 2009, in which to object to the motion. Defendant filed no objection. I am persuaded that counsel's motion should be granted, given their client's unwillingness to work with them . ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the motion of Raymond P. Niro, the firm of Niro, Scavone, 1 Dockets.Justia.com H aller & Niro, Kim Grimmer, Jennifer L. Amundsen and the firm of Solheim Billing & G rim m er to withdraw as counsel for plaintiffs Hyperphrase Technologies and Hyperphrase Inc. is GRANTED. Entered this 5t h day of October, 2009. B Y THE COURT: /s/ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?