SanDisk Corp. v. Phison Electronics Corp. et al

Filing 427

ORDER granting (322) Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; granting (347) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting (400) Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdicton; granting (154) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting (187) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, all in case 3:07-cv-00605-bbc; granting (299) Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; granting (326) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting (378) Motion to Dismiss ; granting (178) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, all in case 3:07-cv-00607-bbc. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 12/31/09. Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00605-bbc, 3:07-cv-00607-bbc (krj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------S AN D IS K CORPORATION, ORDER Plaintiff, 0 7 - cv -6 0 5 - b b c v. PH IS O N ELECTRONICS CORP., S ILIC O N MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP., SILICON MOTION, INC. (TAIWAN), SILICON MOTION, INC. (CALIFORNIA), SILICON M O T IO N INTERNATIONAL, INC. USBEST TECHNOLOGY, INC., S K YM E D I CORP., ZOTEC ELECTRONICS C O ., LTD., ZODATA TECHNOLOGY LTD, P O W E R QUOTIENT INTERNATIONAL C O ., LTD., PQI CORP., KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO., INC.,KINGSTON T EC H N O LO G Y CORP., PAYTON TECHNOLOGY CORP., MEMOSUN, INC., B U FFA L O , INC., MELCO HOLDINGS, INC., BUFFALO TECHNOLOGY (USA), INC., V ER BA T IM CORP., TRANSCEND INFORMATION INC. (TAIWAN), T R AN S C EN D INFORMATION INC. (C AL IFO R N IA , U.S.A.), TRANSCEND IN FO R M A TIO N MARYLAND, INC., A-DATA T E C H N O L O G Y CO., LTD., A-DATA TECHNOLOGY (USA) CO., LTD., APACER T EC H N O L O G Y INC., APACER MEMORY COMPUTER CORP., BEHAVIOR TECH C O M P U T E R USA CORP., DANE-ELEC 1 M E M O R Y , S.A., and DANE-ELECT CORP. USA, D efendan ts. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------S AN D IS K CORPORATION, P l a i n t i ff , 0 7 - cv -6 0 7 - b b c v. PH IS O N ELECTRONICS CORP., S ILIC O N MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP., SILICON MOTION, INC. (TAIWAN), SILICON MOTION, INC. (CALIFORNIA), SILICON M O T IO N INTERNATIONAL, INC. USBEST TECHNOLOGY, INC.,SKYMEDI CORP., CHIPSBRAND MICROELECTRONICS (HK) CO., LTD., CHIPSBANK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) C O ., LTD.,CHIPSBANK MICROELECTRONICS, C O ., LTD., ZOTEC ELECTRONICS C O ., LTD., ZODATA TECHNOLOGY LTD., P O W E R QUOTIENT INTERNATIONAL C O ., LTD., PQI CORP., KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO., INC.,KINGSTON T EC H N O LO G Y CORP., PAYTON TECHNOLOGY CORP., MEMOSUN, INC., B U FFA L O , INC., MELCO HOLDINGS, INC., BUFFALO TECHNOLOGY (USA), INC., V ER BA T IM CORP., TRANSCEND INFORMATION INC. (TAIWAN), T R AN S C EN D INFORMATION INC. (C AL IFO R N IA , U.S.A.), TRANSCEND IN FO R M AT IO N MARYLAND, INC. IMATION C O R P., IMATION ENTERPRISES CORP., M E M O R EX PRODUCTS, INC., ADD-ON 2 T EC H N O L O G Y CO., A-DATA TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., A-DATA TECHNOLOGY (USA) CO., LTD., APACER TECHNOLOGY INC., APACER MEMORY AMERICA, INC., BEHAVIOR TECH COMPUTER CORP., BEHAVIOR TECH COMPUTER USA CORP., DANE-ELEC MEMORY, S.A., DANE-ELECT CORP. USA, LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., D efendan ts. --------------------------------------------Plaintiff SanDisk has advised the court that it does not oppose the motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed in these cases by defendants Behavior Tech Computer C orp ., Behavior Tech Computer USA Corp., Dane-Elec Memory S.A., LG Electronics, Inc., L G Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Power Quotient International Co., Ltd. and PQI Corp. 3 Accordingly the motions are GRANTED and the complaints are DISMISSED against these defendan ts. E n tered this 31s t day of December, 2009. B Y THE COURT: /s/ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?