Austin et al v. Phillip Morris USA

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 MOTION to Reinstate Motions to submit a claim and to submit evidence; denying 16 MOTION for to Submit Claim, 17 MOTION for to Submit Evidence. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/7/2009. (eds),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------- A N N MARIE AUSTIN, ORDER Plaintiff, 0 8 - cv -2 4 4 - b b c v. P H IL L IP MORRIS, USA, D efendan t. --------------------------------------------P lain tiff has an appeal in this case pending before the court of appeals. On July 31, 20 09 , I denied her motion for a discretionary remand and considered her motions to submit a claim and to submit evidence as withdrawn. She now moves to reinstate the withdrawn m otio ns. Plaintiff's motions to submit a claim and to submit evidence are not clear, I un derstand her to be asking to add new evidence to her record on appeal although it is difficult to make out the exact nature of the evidence she wants to add. The record in this case was certified and transmitted to the court of appeals a year ago, on August 6, 2008. The only information that can be included in the record on appeal 1 is the information that was before the court when I denied her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed her case. Plaintiff cannot add new evidence to the appeal record. T herefore, I will deny her motions to submit a claim and to submit evidence. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motions to reinstate her motions to submit a claim and to submit evidence, dkt. #22, are GRANTED. 2 . Plaintiff's motions to submit a claim and to submit evidence (dkt. ##16 and 17) are DENIED. E n tered this 7th day of August, 2009. B Y THE COURT: /s/ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?