Austin v. Dane County Jail et al

Filing 3

Order on IFP request: Petitioner request for IFP denied and case closed. Signed by Judge Barbara B Crabb on 5/30/2008. (arw),(ps)

Download PDF
Austin v. Dane County Jail et al Doc. 3 Case: 3:08-cv-00280-bbc Document #: 3 Filed: 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------C LA R EN C E A. AUSTIN, ORDER Petitioner, 0 8 - cv -2 8 0 - b b c v. D AN E COUNTY JAIL, DODGE CORRECTION FA C IL IT Y, OAK HILL CORRECTION FACILITY, RESOURCE CENTER an d MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, R espo nd ents. --------------------------------------------T h is is a proposed civil action for monetary relief, brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Petition er, a former inmate Dane County Jail, in Madison, Wisconsin, asks for leave to pro ceed under the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. 1915. From the financial affidavit p etitio n er has given the court, I conclude that petitioner is unable to prepay the fee for filing this lawsuit. H ow ever, before petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis, I must determine whether h is action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks money damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case: 3:08-cv-00280-bbc Document #: 3 Filed: 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 4 1 9 1 5(e)(2 ). In addressing any pro se litigant's complaint, the court must read the allegations of the complaint generously. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 521 (1972). Unfortunately, even under a generous reading of petitioner's complaint I must deny him leave to proceed in forma pauperis because several of the respondents he names are not "persons" capable of b ein g sued under 1983 and he does not allege that respondent Madison Police Department had any involvement in creating his allegedly torturous conditions of confinement. Petition er's complaint reads in part as follows: I was torture constantly made to eat roaches, rats, menure, spiders, . . . I fell sick to the point where I nearly died frome the poison that was fed to me . . . in a d m inastrative confinment where I spent 23 hours a day for a whole year 12 (m onths) and 9 more months I have ben molested constantly in this eviroment by vairio us public officials with my health dangerously question and issue mainly frome the poison fed to me induce inside of my stomic intestine while led to my nearly die o r death as frome my incarceration at Dane County where I was made to eat poison (D kt. #1, misspellings in original). This complaint contains many similarities to petitioner's earlier complaint in Austin v. Dane County Jail, 08-cv-180-bbc, which was nearly identical to another complaint petitioner filed over a year ago in Austin v. Dane County Mental H ealth, 07-C-192-C. I denied petitioner leave to proceed in both of those cases. The only important difference between petitioner's claims in those previously dism issed cases and his claim in this action is his attempt to sue new respondents. Here, in addition to Dane County Jail, which was named as a respondent in Austin v. Dane County Jail, petitioner has added respondents Dodge County Correction Facility, Oak Hill 2 Case: 3:08-cv-00280-bbc Document #: 3 Filed: 05/30/2008 Page 3 of 4 Co rrection Facility, Resource Center and Madison Police Department. However, as was the case in Austin v. Dane County Jail, most of the respondents in this case are not proper respo nd ents in a case brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Liability under 1983 attaches to perso ns who "under color of any statute ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage" of state pow er deprive a citizen of any right under the Constitution or federal law. Will v. Michigan D e partm en t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 66-67 (1989); Witte v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 434 F.3d 1031, 1036 (7th Cir. 2006). Therefore, respondents Dane County Jail, Dodge Correction Facility, Oak Hill Correction Facility and Resource Center are not "p erso n s" that may be sued under 1983. Ad dition ally, although petitioner lists the Madison Police Department as a respo nd ent he fails to allege that it, or any of its officers were in anyway involved with his con dition s of confinement. Without allegations that connect the Madison Police D epartm ent to the constitutional violations petitioner allegedly suffered, petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against the department. F ed eral courts have the power to hear cases in which a plaintiff alleges a violation of his constitutional rights or rights established under federal law. 28 U.S.C. 1331. Although petitioner is attempting to sue respondents for jail conditions that violated his constitutional righ ts, he cannot proceed with his claims because the named respondents are either not suable under 1983 or not involved with his jail conditions. 3 Case: 3:08-cv-00280-bbc Document #: 3 Filed: 05/30/2008 Page 4 of 4 OR DER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Clarence A. Austin's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is D EN IED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice; 2. The clerk of court is directed to close the file. E n tered this 30th day of May, 2008. B Y THE COURT: /s/ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?