Edmonds v. Operating Engineers Local 139

Filing 10

ORDER granting 9 Motion for leave to present documents outside of the pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L Crocker on 1/7/09. (elc),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FRANKLIN C. EDMONDS, Plaintiff, v. 08-cv-567-bbc OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 139, Defendant. ORDER This is a civil action for monetary relief in which plaintiff Franklin Edmonds, who is proceeding pro se, alleges that he has been discriminated against by defendant Operating Engineers Local 139. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and a briefing schedule has been set on this motion. In conjunction with this motion, defendant has filed a motion for leave to present to the court documents outside the pleadings and has submitted copies of those documents. The documents are docket sheets and filings in previous cases filed in this court and the District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in which plaintiff sued defendant. Generally, a court cannot consider documents outside the pleadings in deciding a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6); such documents do not become fair game unless they are attached to or at least referred to in the complaint. Tierney v. Vahle, 304 F.3d 734, 738 (7th Cir. 2002). However, there is an exception to this rule: a court may consider "documents contained in the public record" without converting the motion into one for summary judgment. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Thompson, 161 F.3d 449, 456 (7th Cir. 1998). The court documents defendant has submitted are matters of public record and thus may be the subject of judicial notice. Therefore, defendant's motion for leave to present documents outside the pleadings (Dkt. #9) is GRANTED. Entered this 7th day of January, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?