Scheffler v. County of Dunn

Filing 66

ORDER granting 61 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/23/2009. (eds),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN TROY K. SCHEFFLER, P l a i n t i f f, v. C O U N T Y OF DUNN, D efend an t. ORD ER 0 8 - c v- 6 2 2 -b b c Plaintiff Troy K. Scheffler is proceeding in this diversity action against Dunn County, alleging that the Dunn County Sheriff's Department failed to comply with Wisconsin's open records laws, Wis. Stat. §§ 19.21-19.39. Plaintiff is seeking damages for the exacerbation of his medical condition and present and future lost wages. Now before the court is defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to produce audio recordings as requested in request for production of documents #11. Plaintiff objects to the motion. In request #11, defendant asked plaintiff to produce copies of audio and video recordings in his possession that relate to his claims in this case. Plaintiff produced some audio recordings. However, he did not produce a recording from July 1, 2008, that his friend allegedly made at the Dunn County Jail, and an audio recording of a telephone conversation between himself and defendant's counsel. Plaintiff has refused to produce these recordings. Therefore, I will grant defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to produce the audio recordings requested in request for production of documents # 11, including the July 1, 2008 recording and the recording of the telephone conversation between plaintiff and defendant's counsel. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion to compel production of audio recordings, dkt. #61, is GRANTED. The recordings shall be produced to defendant's counsel not later than five days after plaintiff receives this order. Entered this 23rd day of October, 2009. BY THE COURT: /s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?