Riddell, Inc. v. Schutt Sports, Inc.

Filing 47

ORDER finding that claim construction is necessary; hearing may be held on the morning of 6/17/09 or 6/18/09 if the parties are available. Parties to notify court by 6/5/09 as to what hearing date works for all. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/2/2009. (llj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------RIDDELL, INC., P l a i n t i ff , v. 0 8 - cv -7 1 1 - b b c S C H U T T SPORTS, INC., D efendan ts. --------------------------------------------In response to an order entered by the court on May 21, 2009, dkt. #43, defendant Schutt Sports, Inc. has requested a claims construction hearing and provided reasons why it believes a hearing is necessary, dkt. #45. Plaintiff Riddell, Inc. opposes defendant's request, stating that a hearing is unnecessary and will serve only to allow defendant an o p po rtu nity to supplement its briefing and introduce new evidence. Dkt. ## 44 and 46. T he court has decided that construction of 11 terms is necessary to resolve clearly disputed issues concerning infringement or invalidity. When it appeared that the court could not accommodate plaintiff's proposed hearing dates and I was not fully convinced that a hearing was necessary, I reserved ruling on whether to hold a hearing and asked the parties to respond. Although a hearing may not be entirely necessary, I agree that it might be useful both to educate the court and to assist the court in resolving the parties' disputes. If the 1 OR DER parties are available on either the morning of June 17 or June 18, 2009, the court will hold a claims construction hearing on the eleven identified terms. I will give the parties until June 5, 2009 in which to notify the court whether either of those dates will work. E n tered this 2n d day of June, 2009. B Y THE COURT: /s/ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?