Titus Henderson v. Rick Raemisch et al
Filing
24
ORDER staying plaintiff's 2 motion to waive the initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 9/30/2011. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/8/2011. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TITUS HENDERSON,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
09-cv-170-bbc
v.
RICK RAEMISCH, PETER HUIBREGTSE,
GARY BOUGHTON, ELLEN RAY,
TOM GOZINSKI, WELCOME ROSE,
AMY SMITH, HELLEN KENNEBECK,
KATHRYN ANDERSON, LARRY PRIMMER,
JANA JUERGENS, MONICA HORNER,
TRISHA LANSING, NANCY SALMON,
ELLEN RAY, C. BEERKIRCHER,
THOMAS TAYLOR, DAVID GARDNER,
LT. BOISEN, BRIAN KOOL, TIM HAINES,
CRAIG TOM, LT. HANFIELD, JOSH BROWN,
H. BROWN, W. BROWN, SGT. FURER,
CO NEIS, SGT. CARPENTER,
SGT. BOARDMAN, SGT. BLOYER,
COII JONES, COII JOHNSON, CO HULCE,
COII KARNOPP, R. STARKEY,
SGT. WALLACE, COII ECKT, COII EWING,
D. ESSER, M. SCULLION, JEROMEY CAYA,
JENNIFER SICKINGER, JOAN WATERMAN,
WENDY THOMPSON, SGT. TREFT,
SGT. COOK and JOHN DOES,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1
In an order entered in this case on August 18, 2011, this court assessed plaintiff Titus
Henderson a $0.03 initial partial payment of the $350 filing fee and gave him until
September 8, 2011, in which to make his payment. Now plaintiff has submitted a letter in
which he asks the court to waive the initial partial payment because he has no money in his
regular or release accounts. I construe plaintiff’s letter to be a motion to waive the initial
partial filing fee in this case.
Under §1915(b)(4), a prisoner may not be prohibited from bringing a lawsuit if “the
prisoner has no assets and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee. In
measuring periodic income, § 1915, the court must look at the prisoner’s average monthly
deposits and average monthly balance from the six month period immediately preceding the
filing of his lawsuit. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In this case, the trust fund account statement
that the court used to assess plaintiff’s initial partial payment was from the six months
preceding the filing of his complaint on March 23, 2009. This trust fund account statement
shows that plaintiff had an average monthly balance of $0.15 for that period. If plaintiff’s
most recent six-month trust fund account statement shows that he has no monthly deposits
and a zero monthly balance, then I will grant his motion to waive the initial partial filing fee
in this case.
Plaintiff’s trust fund account statement should cover the six-month period beginning
approximately M arch 8, 2011 and ending approximately September 8, 2011. Once plaintiff has
submitted the necessary statement, I will calculate his initial partial payment and advise him of
2
the amount he will have to pay before the court can screen the merits of his complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff should show a copy of this order to prison officials to insure
that they are aware they should send a copy of plaintiff’s six-month trust fund account statement
to this court.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Titus Henderson’s motion to waive the initial partial
payment in this case, dkt. #22, is STAYED pending receipt of a certified copy of his most
recent six month trust fund account statement. Plaintiff may have until September 30, 2011,
in which to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the period beginning
approximately March 8, 2011 and ending approximately September 8, 2011. If, by September
30, 2011, plaintiff fails to respond to this order, I will assume that he wishes to withdraw this
action voluntarily. In that event, the clerk of court is directed to close this case without prejudice
to plaintiff's filing his case at a later date.
Entered this 8th day of September, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?