Williams v. Huibregtse

Filing 46

Order certifying petitioner's appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/13/2010. (eds),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN A N D R E A WILLIAMS, P e t i t io n e r , v. P E T E R HUIBREGTSE, Warden, W is co n sin Secure Program Facility, R espo n d en t. ORD ER 0 9 -c v -2 0 4 -s lc A n d rea Williams has filed a notice of appeal from this court's order and judgment entered M a rc h 8, 2010. Because petitioner has not paid the appellate filing and docketing fee, I presume th at he seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. In a previous order, I determined that petitio n er was indigent. Accordingly, petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal unless I c er tify that his appeal is not taken in good faith. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). To find that his appeal is ta k en in good faith, I need find only that reasonable people would suppose the appeal has merit. W alker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 631-32 (7th Cir. 2000). Even though this is a lower standard than th at required for a certificate of appealability, I find that Williams is unable to meet it. There is sim ply no room to argue that the state court of appeals adjudicated his claims in an unreasonable m anner. ORD ER P u r su a n t to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4), I certify that petitioner Andrea Williams's appeal is not ta k en in good faith. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), petitioner may ask the court of appeals fo r permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Entered this 13 th day of April, 2010. B Y THE COURT: /s / S T E P H E N L. CROCKER M a g is tr a te Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?