Ramirez v. SULIENE et al

Filing 148

ORDER denying 143 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/30/10. (elc),(ps)

Download PDF
Ramirez v. SULIENE et al Doc. 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------LUIS A. RAMIREZ, P la i n ti f f , v. C UR TIS DELONG, MARK ISAACSON an d VICTOR TRIMBLE, D efendan ts. --------------------------------------------Plaintiff Luis Ramirez is proceeding on a claim that defendants Curtis Delong, Mark I s a a cso n and Victor Tremble violated his Eighth Amendment rights by disregarding sy m p to m s he suffered as a result of methadone withdrawal. Trial is scheduled for August 23 , 2010. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the case as a sanction for plaintiff 's alleged creation of fraudulent documents. Dkt. #143. In particular, defendants say that, during his deposition on July 22, 2010, plaintiff presented counsel for defendants with a journal that he intends to use as evidence at trial to corroborate his version of events and to refresh his recollection . Although plaintiff claims to have written the journal in 2007, defendants ORDER 09-cv-314-bbc 1 Dockets.Justia.com believe that defendant did not create the journal until 2010. Defendants' proof is that several pages of the journal include dates from 2010 immediately after dates from 2007. D efendan ts' motion will be denied because the issue they raise is one for the jury to resolve. If defendants believe they have caught plaintiff in a lie, they are free to impeach him w ith the evidence they have while he is testifying at trial. OR DER IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Curtis Delong, Mark Isaacso n and Victor Tremble, dkt. #144, is DENIED. E n tered this 30 t h day of July, 2010. B Y THE COURT: /s/ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?