Cardoso-Lopez v. United States of America

Filing 4

ORDER dismissing 1 Motion to Vacate Sentence per 28 USC 2255. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/18/09. (rep)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER Plaintiff, 09-cv-509-bbc 08-cr-133-bbc v. JO R G E CARDOSO-LOPEZ, D efendan t. --------------------------------------------D efendan t Jorge Cardoso-Lopez has filed a motion for post conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255. On January 9, 2009, defendant was convicted in this court of illegal reentry by a previously deported alien. On January 12, 2009, defendant appealed his con viction to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. His appeal is pending. A bsen t extraordinary circumstances, the district court should not consider 2255 m otions while a direct appeal is pending. United States v. Robinson, 8 F.3d 398 (7th Cir. 1 99 3). Defendant has not alleged any extraordinary circumstances that require con sideration of his 2255 motion while his appeal is pending. Therefore, I will dismiss defendan t's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion without prejudice because it is premature. 1 I am aware that 28 U.S.C. 2244(a) would prevent the court from entertaining a secon d motion by defendant under 28 U.S.C. 2255 if I had decided the legality of his motion. Because the motion is denied as premature and not on the merits, defendant may file a new 2255 motion after his appeal is decided. Such a motion would not be "second o r successive" motion under 28 U.S.C. 2244(a). O'Connor v. United States, 133 F. 3d 548, 6 9 4 (7th Cir.1998) (when 2255 petition is returned to petitioner on ground that no co llateral attack could be begun while appeal pending, it does not count as petition; petitioner may file new motion after appeal decided without obtaining permission from the cou rt of appeals). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant Jorge Luis Cardoso-Lopez's motion for post con viction relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice as premature. Entered this 18th day of September, 2009. B Y THE COURT: /s/ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?