Kallembach, Darrel Lee v. City Of Platteville

Filing 19

ORDER denying 15 Motion for Refund of Filing Fee. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/1/2010. (eds),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------In re: DARREL KALLEMBACH as the Intervenor In terven tio n of Right as Claimant Argyle, Wisconsin L AR R Y KALLEMBACH as the witness, Plaintiffs. OR DER 0 9 - cv -7 1 1 - b b c --------------------------------------------In re: LARRY KALLEMBACH as the Intervenor In terven tio n of my Fundamental Right as Claimant Platteville, Wisconsin DARREL KALLEMBACH as the witness i.e. W itn ess Protection Act 18 USCA Section 1512-1515 Plaintiff. OR DER 0 9 - c v -7 3 6 - b b c --------------------------------------------In an order dated December 10, 2009, I dismissed these cases for lack of subject m a tt er jurisdiction. Now plaintiff Larry Kallembach requests that the $350 filing fees in each case be returned. The request will be denied. As the name suggests, the $350 fee is the fee for filing a case. Litigants whose cases are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or for any other reason do not get their money back even if the case is dismissed at an early stage; they have received the service for which they paid, which is the filing of the complaint and the opening of a case. The fee covers the adm inistrative costs incurred at the time of filing. Neither the Federal Rules of Civil P ro ced ure nor any statute enacted by Congress authorizes a district court to refund a filing fee in instances in which the filed case is closed following a ruling by the judge. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Larry Kallembach's request for a refund of the filing fees he paid in cases 09cv-711-bbc and 09-cv-736-bbc, is DENIED. E n tered this 1s t day of March, 2010. B Y THE COURT: /s/ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ B AR B AR A B. CRABB D istrict Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?