Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc.

Filing 34

Declaration of Louis W. Tompros filed by Counter Claimant Apple Inc., Defendant Apple Inc. re: 26 Motion to Admit William F. Lee, Keith Slenkovich, Cynthia D. Vreeland, Domonic E. Massa, Mark D. Selwyn, Anna T. Lee, Joel Cavanaugh, Louis W. Tompros, and Christopher R. Noyes Pro Hac Vice filed by Apple Inc. (Peterson, James)

Download PDF
Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc. Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN __________________________________________ ) NOKIA CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) APPLE INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-249 ) APPLE INC., ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Counterclaim-Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NOKIA CORPORATION and NOKIA INC., ) ) Counterclaim-Defendants. ) __________________________________________) DECLARATION OF LOUIS W. TOMPROS IN SUPPORT OF PRO HAC ADMISSION Louis W. Tompros, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declares as follows: 1. I am an attorney with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, located at 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. I am counsel to Apple Inc. in this matter. 2. I was first admitted to the practice of law before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on December 15, 2003. I am currently a member in good standing of the bar of that court, and my bar number is 657791. 3. My law license has never been suspended or revoked. -1US1DOCS 7610546v1 Dockets.Justia.com 4. I have been provided with a copy of the Standards for Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit and I agree to abide by those standards. 5. This Declaration is made in support of a motion for my admission pro hac vice to appear in this case. 6. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 22nd day of July, 2010. Louis W. Tompros 5172683_1 -2US1DOCS 7610546v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?