Novozymes A/S et al. v. Danisco A/S et al.

Filing 837

ORDER canceling hearing set for 11/18/2011; setting amended briefing schedule on plaintiffs' motion for permanent injunction. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/8/2011. (llj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVOZYMES A/S and NOVOZYMES NORTH AMERICA, INC., ORDER Plaintiffs, 10-cv-251-bbc v. DANISCO A/S, GENENCOR INTERNATIONAL WISCONSIN, INC., DANISCO US INC. and DANISCO USA INC., Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - After the jury awarded plaintiffs Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. more than $18 million for infringement by defendants Danisco A/S, Genencor International Wisconsin, Inc., Dansico US Inc. and Danisco USA Inc. of U.S. Patent No. 7,713,723, plaintiffs requested a hearing on their motion for a permanent injunction. Although I originally scheduled a hearing for November 18, upon further reflection I believe that it would be a wiser use of judicial resources to follow the court’s normal practice for resolving similar motions in patent cases. That is, I will decide plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction in the context of resolving any other postverdict motions filed by the parties. If I conclude that 1 a hearing is necessary after reviewing the parties’ submissions, I will schedule one at that time. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on plaintiffs Novozymes A/S’s and Novozymes North America, Inc.’s motion for a permanent injunction scheduled for November 18, 2011, is CANCELED. Defendants Danisco A/S, Genencor International Wisconsin, Inc., Danisco US Inc. and Danisco USA Inc. may have until November 23, 2011 to file a brief in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs may have until December 2, 2011, to file a reply brief. The previous order giving defendants until November 14, 2011, in which to file a brief in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction is rescinded. Entered this 8th day of November, 2011. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?