Novozymes A/S et al. v. Danisco A/S et al.

Filing 84

Order providing additional information to counsel re: injunctive hearing. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/27/2010. (llj)

N o v ozym es A/S et al. v. Danisco A/S et al.

Do c. 84

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------N OV OZ YM ES A/S and N O V O ZY M ES NORTH AMERICA, INC., MEMORANDUM P l a in t i f f s , 1 0 - c v - 2 5 1 -b b c v. D A N ISC O A/S, GENECOR INTERNATIONAL WISCONSIN, INC., D A N ISC O US INC. and DANISCO USA INC., D e fe n d a n t s . --------------------------------------------A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for September 17, 2010, in this case for patent infringement. Defendants have filed a letter in which they wish to confirm that "the declarations that the parties file in connection with their pre-hearing briefs will not be rejected for hearsay reasons even though the declarants do not appear live at the hearing." Dkt. #68. I have no objection to this. In deciding the motion for a preliminary injunction, I will consider written testimony submitted by the parties along with any live testimony presented at the hearing. In addition, defendants ask whether the hearing will be limited to three hours. Defendants are correct that I anticipated that the hearing could be completed in that amount

Dockets.Justia.com

of time. If either side believes more time is needed, they should notify the court. The parties are free to use the hearing to present an oral argument, examine witnesses or both. Entered this 27th day of August, 2010. B Y THE COURT: /s / B A R BA R A B. CRABB D istrict Judge