Novozymes A/S et al. v. Danisco A/S et al.

Filing 968

AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of defendants declaring that claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent 7,713,723 are invalid for lack of an adequate written description. (BBC/PAO) Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 5/15/2012. (llj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DlSTRlCT OF WISCONSIN
NOVOZYMES NS and NOVOZYMES
NORTH AMERlCA, INC.,

AMENDED
JUDGMENT IN A CfYIL CASE

Plaintiffs,
Case No. 10-cv-251-bbc
v.

DANISCO A/S, GENENCOR
INTERNATIONAL WISCONSIN, INC.,
DANISCO US INC. and DANISCO USA
INC.,
Defendants.

This action came for consideration before the court with District Judge Barbara B. Crabb
presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor ofdefendants
Danisco NS, Genencor Intemational Wisconsin, Inc., Danisco US Inc. and Danisco USA, Inc.,
declaring that claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent NO.7 ,713,723 are invalid for lack of an adequate
written description.
APPROVED AS TO FORM this

Barbara B. Crabb, District Judge

1/ U- day of May, 2012.