Boyd, Tammy v. Meriter Health Services Employee Retirement Plan et al

Filing 112

ORDER construing 111 as motion to strike plaintiff's self-imposed waiver condition on defendants' review of proposed class representatives' interrogatory answers; motion is granted. Plaintiff sanctioned $100, to be paid to the clerk of court. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/20/11. (krj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN TAMMY J. BOYD, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 10-cv-426-wmc MERITER HEALTH SERVICES EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN and MERITER HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Defendants. The court is in receipt of defendants Meriter Health Services Employee Retirement Plan and Meriter Health Services, Inc.’s letter dated today, September 20, 2011. (Dkt. #111.) The court treats defendants’ letter as a motion to strike plaintiff’s self-imposed waiver condition on representatives’ interrogatory answers. defendants’ review of the proposed class The court made clear in the hearing on September 2, 2011, and its subsequently filed order (dkt. #102) that plaintiff’s counsel must fully cooperate in expedited discovery efforts to ameliorate prejudice to defendants caused by plaintiff’s failure to timely disclose a list of proposed class representatives. While plaintiff may have had some (technical) basis for objecting to defendants’ propounding party interrogatories to proposed class representatives under ordinary circumstances, these are not ordinary circumstances, largely due to plaintiff’s own delays. Moreover, under NO circumstances, can the court conceive it appropriate for one side in a discovery dispute to impose its own, unique discovery conditions having no basis in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rather than interpose proper objections and/or seek relief from this court. Since plaintiff did neither, and the interrogatories (though better directed to plaintiff) stream-line discovery efforts and will help minimize the amount of time spent in depositions of the proposed, additional class representatives, defendants’ motion to strike (dkt. #111) is GRANTED, and plaintiff is sanctioned $100 to be paid to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Entered this 20th day of September, 2011. BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?