Carter, Jackie v. Radtke, Dylan et al

Filing 172

AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Jackie Carter against Dylon Radtke and Janel Nickel, adding the award of $226.50 in attorneys' fees, of which $75.00 is due solely from defendant Radtke, $150.00 is due solely from defendant Nickel, and the remainder $1.50 is due jointly and severally from both defendants. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 3/24/2017. (WMC /PAO). (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRJCT OF WISCONSIN JACKIE CARTER, Plaintiff, v. DYLON RADTKE, GREGORY GRAMS, JANEL NICKEL, RICK RAEMISCH, JOANNE LANE, MARY LEISER, DR. DALIA SULIENE, LORI ALSUM, ALICE ROGERS and THOMAS MALONEY, AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Case No. 10-cv-510-wmc Defendants. This action came before the court for consideration with District Judge William M. Conley presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered 1) Denying plaintiff Jackie Carter leave to proceed against defendants Dalia Suliene, Lori Alsum and Thomas Maloney; 2) Granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Gregory Grams, Rick Raemisch, Joanne Lane, Mary Leiser and Alice Rogers; 3) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $1.00 for compensatory damages against defendants Dylon Radtke and Janel Nickel, jointly and severally; 4) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $50.00 in punitive damages against defendant Dylon Radtke; 5) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $100.00 in punitive damages against defendant Janel Nickel; and Jud ment in a Civil Case Pa e 2 6) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $226.50 in attorney's fees, of which $75.00 is due solely from defendant Radtke, $150.00 is due solely from defendant Nickel, and the remainder $1.50 is due jointly and severally from both defendants. Approved as to form this Peter Oppeneer, Clerk of Court - ,.., }; ~day of March, 2017. Date

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?