Carter, Jackie v. Radtke, Dylan et al
Filing
172
AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Jackie Carter against Dylon Radtke and Janel Nickel, adding the award of $226.50 in attorneys' fees, of which $75.00 is due solely from defendant Radtke, $150.00 is due solely from defendant Nickel, and the remainder $1.50 is due jointly and severally from both defendants. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 3/24/2017. (WMC /PAO). (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRJCT OF WISCONSIN
JACKIE CARTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
DYLON RADTKE, GREGORY GRAMS,
JANEL NICKEL, RICK RAEMISCH,
JOANNE LANE, MARY LEISER,
DR. DALIA SULIENE, LORI ALSUM,
ALICE ROGERS and THOMAS MALONEY,
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A
CIVIL CASE
Case No. 10-cv-510-wmc
Defendants.
This action came before the court for consideration with District Judge
William M. Conley presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has
been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered
1) Denying plaintiff Jackie Carter leave to proceed against defendants Dalia
Suliene, Lori Alsum and Thomas Maloney;
2) Granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Gregory Grams, Rick
Raemisch, Joanne Lane, Mary Leiser and Alice Rogers;
3) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $1.00 for compensatory damages against
defendants Dylon Radtke and Janel Nickel, jointly and severally;
4) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $50.00 in punitive damages against
defendant Dylon Radtke;
5) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $100.00 in punitive damages against
defendant Janel Nickel; and
Jud ment in a Civil Case
Pa e 2
6) Awarding plaintiff Jackie Carter $226.50 in attorney's fees, of which
$75.00 is due solely from defendant Radtke, $150.00 is due solely from
defendant Nickel, and the remainder $1.50 is due jointly and severally from
both defendants.
Approved as to form this
Peter Oppeneer, Clerk of Court
- ,.., };
~day of March, 2017.
Date
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?