Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 7

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Counter Claimant Motorola Mobility, Inc., Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (Hansen, Scott)

Download PDF
Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC. Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC. & MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 10-cv-661-slc JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.'S DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND FINANCIAL INTEREST I, the undersigned counsel of record for Motorola Mobility, Inc., make the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? YES. If the answer is YES, list below and identify the parent corporation or affiliate and the relationship between it and the named party: 100% of the stock of Motorola Mobility, Inc. is owned by Motorola, Inc. Motorola, Inc. is publicly traded (NYSE: MOT). Motorola, Inc. has no parent corporation. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to this case, that has a financial interest in the outcome? YES. If the answer is YES, list the identity of such corporation and the nature of the financial interest to the named party: Three entities own at least five percent of Motorola, Inc.'s stock: (1) BlackRock, Inc., a publicly traded asset management firm (NYSE: BLK), and its subsidiaries, (2) Dodge & Cox, a privately held investment advising firm, and (3) Carl C. Icahn, a private investor, through entities wholly-owned by himself. Additionally, AXA, S.A., a French holding company for an international group of insurance and related financial services companies, including AXA Financial, Inc. and its subsidiary, AllianceBernstein L.P., shares investment discretion with its subsidiaries over at least five percent of Motorola, Inc.'s stock. Signature: : /s/ Scott W. Hansen Date: November 9, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?