Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 114

Supplemental Declaration of Winslow B. Taub filed by Plaintiffs/Counter Claimants Apple, Inc., NeXT Software, Inc. re: 113 Motion for Leave to File, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Excerpt from Certified Translation of JP Prosecution History, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Excerpt from Certified Translation of JP Prosecution History, Claim 9) (Peterson, James)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC., and NEXT SOFTWARE, INC. (f/k/a NeXT COMPUTER, INC.), Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants, v. Case No. 10-CV-662 (BBC) MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. Defendants and CounterclaimPlaintiffs SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF WINSLOW B. TAUB IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC. AND NEXT SOFTWARE, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION EVIDENCE I, Winslow B. Taub, hereby declare: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, counsel of record for Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and NeXT Software (“NeXT”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) in the above-captioned matter. The matters referenced in this declaration are based on personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could, and would, testify competently to these matters. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the certified translation of the prosecution file history of the Japanese counterpart to U.S. Patent No. 5,319,712, showing five pages that demonstrate that the Japanese counterpart claims priority through a PCT application to the application that issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,319,712. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the certified translation of the prosecution file history of the Japanese counterpart to U.S. Patent No. 5,319,712 showing claim 9 of the Japanese counterpart. Executed on July 19, 2011 at San Francisco, California. /s/ Winslow B. Taub Winslow B. Taub 6608929_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?