Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 165

Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Rebuttal Expert Witness Reports and Summary Judgment Motion Papers by Defendants Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola, Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Response due 10/6/2011. (Frihart Kennedy, Rebecca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC., and NEXT SOFTWARE, INC. (f/k/a NeXT COMPUTER, INC.) Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants, Case No. 10-CV-662 (BBC) v. MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendants and CounterclaimPlaintiffs. JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESS REPORTS AND SERVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION PAPERS Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Apple, Inc. and Next Software, Inc. and Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Motorola, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc., by their undersigned attorneys, jointly respectfully request that this Court modify the upcoming deadlines for exchanging rebuttal expert witness reports and for filing summary judgment motion papers. Currently, rebuttal expert reports are due on October 14, 2011, and motions for summary judgment are due on October 21, 2011. The parties respectfully request that the deadline for serving rebuttal expert witness reports be moved to October 21, 2011 and the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment be moved to November 4, 2011. The number and complexity of expert reports in this action is the primary motivating consideration for the requested extensions. The additional time requested will provide each party with additional time to prepare thorough rebuttal expert witness reports and to incorporate considerations raised in those rebuttal reports into their summary judgment motion papers. Trial is currently scheduled for April 30, 2012, with a final pretrial conference scheduled for April 12, 2012 and Motions in Limine due on March 16, 2012. The parties are not requesting that these dates be moved, do not anticipate that they will need to be moved as a result of the extension requested, and fully appreciate that the extension requested may result in their not receiving a summary judgment motion ruling until closer to the scheduled trial date. Respectfully submitted this 29th day of September, 2011. s/ Rebecca Frihart Kennedy Scott W. Hansen shansen@reinhartlaw.com Lynn M. Stathas lsthathas@reinhartlaw.com David G. Hanson dhanson@reinhartlaw.com Rebecca Frihart Kennedy rkennedy@reinhartlaw.com Lisa Nester Kass lkass@reinhartlaw.com Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, S.C. 22 East Mifflin Street Madison, WI 53703-4220 Telephone: (414) 298-1000 Facsimile: (414) 298-8097 Edward J. DeFranco eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com Alexander Rudis alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com Richard W. Erwine richarderwine@quinnemanuel.com Carlos A. Rodriguez carlsorodriguez@quinnemanuel.com /s/_Elizabeth Weiswasser_________ Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser elizabeth.weiswasser@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 Jill J. Ho jill.ho@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Mark G. Davis mark.davis@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 682-7000 Facsimile: (202) 857-0940 2 David M. Elihu davidelihu@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7106 Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 David A. Nelson davenelson@quinnemanuel.com Jennifer A. Bauer jenniferbauer@quinnemanuel.com Robert R. Cleary, Jr. robertcleary@quinnemanuel.com Amy L. Signaigo amysignaigo@quinnemanuel.com Amanda S. Williamson amandawilliamson@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Chicago, Ill 60661 Telephone: (312) 705-7400 Facsimile: (312) 705-7401 Charles K. Verhoeven charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com David L. Shaul davidshaul@quinnemanuel.com Linda J. Brewer lindabrewer@quinnemanuel.com Kevin A. Smith kevinsmith@quinnemanuel.com David A. Perlson davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Kevin P.B. Johnson kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Robert W. Stone robertstone@quinnemanuel.com Meghan Bordonaro meghanbordonaro@quinnemanuel.com Robert D. Fram rfram@cov.com Christine Saunders Haskett chaskett@cov.com Samuel F. Ernst sernst@cov.com Winslow B. Taub wtaub@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5356 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 Robert T. Haslam (CA Bar No. 71134) rhaslam@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418 Telephone: (650) 632-4700 Facsimile: (650) 632-4800 Matthew D. Powers Matthew.Powers@tensegritylawgroup.com Steven Cherensky Steven.Cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-6000 Facsimile: (650) 802-6001 James Donald Peterson (# 1022819) One East Main Street, Suite 500 P.O. Box 2719 Madison, WI 53701-2719 Telephone: (608) 257-3911 Facsimile: (608) 257-0609 Catherine Cetrangolo ccetrangolo@boardmanlawfirm.com BOARDMAN LAW FIRM LLP One South Pinckney Street, 4th Floor Madison, WI 53701-0927 Tel: 608-283-1703 3 Brian Cannon briancannon@quinnemanuel.com Thomas R. Watson thomaswatson@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Apple Inc. and NeXT Software, Inc Jeffrey N. Boozell jeffreyboozell@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for Defendants Motorola, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc. 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?