Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 213

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Plaintiff Apple, Inc.. Brief in Opposition due 11/25/2011. Brief in Reply due 12/5/2011. (Haslam, Robert)

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

APPLE INC., and NEXT SOFTWARE,
INC. (f/k/a NeXT COMPUTER, INC.),
Plaintiffs and
CounterclaimDefendants,
Case No. 10-CV-662 (BBC)

v.
MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA
MOBILITY, INC.
Defendants and
CounterclaimPlaintiffs

PLAINTIFFS AND COUNTER-CLAIMANTS APPLE INC. AND NEXT SOFTWARE,
INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CONFIDENTIAL - FILED UNDER SEAL

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Apple Inc. and NeXT Software, Inc. (“Apple”)
respectfully move for an order granting summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 :
(1) Granting summary judgment that Apple does not infringe the asserted claims under
each of Motorola’s Counterclaims for patent infringement on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,311,516 (the
“’516 patent”), 5,319,712 (the “’712 patent”), 5,572,193 (the “’193 patent”), 6,175,559 (the
“’559 patent”) and 6,359,898 (the “’898 patent”) (as to claim 5) (Dkt. Nos. 70-1 through 70-2
and 70-4 through 70-6).
(2) Granting summary judgment that each of the asserted claims of each of the ’516,
’193, ’559, and ’898 patents is invalid;
(3) Prohibiting Motorola from using Apple’s sales to establish damages for direct
infringement of method claims by Apple;
(4) Granting summary judgment in favor of Apple on each of Motorola’s counterclaims
and defenses alleging invalidity for lack of patentable subject matter for U.S. Patent Nos.
7,479,949 (the “’949 patent”), 6,493,002 (the “’002 patent”), RE 39,486 (the “RE ’486 patent”),
6,424,354 (the “’354 patent”), 6,343,263 (the “’263 patent”), 6,275,983 (the “’983 patent”),
5,946,647 (the “’647 patent”), 5,929,852 (the “’852 patent”), 5,915,131 (the “’131 patent”),
5,566,337 (the “’337 patent”), 5,519,867 (the “’867 patent”), 5,481,721 (the “’721 patent”), and
5,455,599 (the “’599 patent”) (Dkt. Nos. 12-1 through 12-2, 12-4 through 12-7, and 12-9 through
12-15);
(5) Granting summary judgment in favor of Apple on indefiniteness grounds for the ’949,
’599, ’721, ’867, ’337, ’852, ’647, ’983, ’263, ’354, RE ’486, and ’002 patents;

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
(6) Granting summary judgment in favor of Apple on written description grounds for the
’599, ’721, ’867, ’131, ’852, ’647, ’983 (as to claims 1 and 7), ’263, ’354, RE ’486, and ’002
patents; and
(7) Granting summary judgment in favor of Apple on enablement grounds for the ’949,
’599, ’721, ’867, ’337, ’131, ’852, ’647, ’263, ’354, RE ’486, and ’002 patents.

Dated: November 4, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Robert T. Haslam
Robert T. Haslam (CA Bar No. 71134)
[e-mail]
Anupam Sharma
[e-mail]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Robert D. Fram (CA Bar No. 126750)
[e-mail]
Christine Saunders Haskett (CA Bar No. 188053)
[e-mail]
Samuel F. Ernst (CA Bar No. 223963)
[e-mail]
Winslow B. Taub (CA Bar No. 233456)
[e-mail]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5356
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jill J. Ho
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Mark G. Davis
[e-mail]
Brian E. Ferguson
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Elizabeth S. Weiswasser
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 5th Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Matthew D. Powers
[e-mail]
Steven Cherensky
[e-mail]
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-802-6001
Catherine Cetrangolo
Boardman Law Firm LLP
One South Pinckney Street -- 4th Fl.
Madison, WI 53703
[e-mail]
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Apple Inc.
and NeXT Software, Inc.

3