Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 74

Declaration of Brian C. Cannon filed by Defendants Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola, Inc. re: 71 Motion to Admit Thomas R. Watson, Brian C. Cannon, Richard W. Erwine, Linda J. Brewer, Carlos A. Rodriguez, Meghan E. Bordonaro, David L. Shaul, and Melissa N. Chan Pro Hac Vice (Kass, Lisa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC. and NeXT SOFTWARE, INC. (f/k/a NeXT COMPUTER, INC.), Plaintiffs, v. MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-CV-662 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DECLARATION OF BRIAN C. CANNON FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE 1. I am an attorney with Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am counsel for defendants Motorola, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc. My office is located at: 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: 650-801-5000 Facsimile: 650-801-5100 2. I am a member in good standing of the State Bars of California, New York and Illinois. I am currently admitted to practice before the following courts:  United States District Court, Northern District of California  United States District Court, Southern District of California  United States District Court, Central District of California  United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas  United States District Court, Northern District of Texas 3. I have never been disbarred by any court. 4. I have read the Standards for Professional Conduct for the Western District of Wisconsin and agree to abide by those standards. 5. This Declaration is made in support of a motion for my admission pro hac vice to appear in this case. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 28th day of March, 2011. Brian C. Cannon REINHART\6268304 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?