Miller, Stacey v. USA

Filing 2

ORDER denying 1 Motion to modify sentence and for reconsideration of previous order denying 3582 motion for modification of sentence. Civil case closed. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/4/2010. (llj)

Download PDF
Miller, Stacey v. USA Doc. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN --------------------------------------------UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STACEY MILLER, Defendant. --------------------------------------------Defendant Stacey Miller has filed a second motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and a motion for reconsideration of the January 4, 2010 order, dkt. #176, denying his first motion for modification of sentence brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Both motions must be denied. Defendant thinks that he is eligible for a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 and Amendments 706 and 711 to the Sentencing Guidelines. At sentencing, defendant was determined to be a career offender as defined in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a). As a career offender, he is not affected by the 2007 amendments to the sentencing guidelines, which were intended to reduce the disparities in sentences for crack cocaine and powder cocaine. Therefore, he is not entitled to the reduction. ORDER 01-cr-71-bbc 1 Dockets.Justia.com ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant Stacey Miller's second motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and a motion for reconsideration of the January 4, 2010 order denying his first motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) are DENIED. Entered this 4th day of November, 2010. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?