Gentry, Dale v. Karlen, Thomas
Filing
11
ORDER that the new briefing schedule for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is as follows: Petitioner's Brief in Support due 6/29/2011. Respondent's Brief in Opposition due 7/29/2011. Petitioner's Brief in Reply due 8/18/2011. Submission of a reply brief in optional. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/14/2011. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DALE J. GENTRY,
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
11-cv-120-wmc
THOMAS E. KARLEN,
Respondent.
On May 2, 2011, the state filed its response to petitioner Dale Gentry’s petition for a
writ of habeas corpus, dkt. #9. Pursuant to the terms of the order to show cause, petitioner had
30 days, or until June 1, 2011, in which to file a brief in support of his petition. It is now June
14, 2011 and petitioner has neither submitted a brief nor asked for more time within which to
do so. Because petitioner is proceeding pro se, I will give him one more chance to submit a brief
in support of his petition.
In his brief, petitioner must show either that (1) the state appellate court contravened
a controlling opinion of the United States Supreme Court;( 2) the state appellate court applied
a controlling opinion of the United States Supreme Court in an unreasonable manner; or (3) the
state appellate court’s decision rested upon an unreasonable determination of the facts. 28
U.S.C. § 2254(d).
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the new briefing schedule is as follows:
Petitioner shall have until June 29, 2011 to submit a brief in support of his petition for
a writ of habeas corpus. Failure to submit a brief in support will result in dismissal of the
petition for failure to prosecute. The respondent may have until July 29, 2011 to file a brief in
opposition. Petitioner may have until August 18, 2011 to submit a reply brief. Submission of
this reply brief is optional.
Entered this 14th day of June, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
STEPHEN L. CROCKER
Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?