Apple Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.

Filing 510

JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. dismissing with prejudice plaintiff Apple Inc.'s claims that defendant violated 2 of the Sherman Act (count 5), violated Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 (count 6), and tortiously interfered with contracts (count 13); and dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's claims against defendant for equitable estoppel (count 1), breach of contract (counts 2, 3 and 4), and declaratory judgment (counts 7, 11 and 12). (PAO) (arw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC., JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Plaintiff, Case No. ll-cv-178-bbc v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendant. This action came for consideration before the court with District Judge Barbara B. Crabb presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. and against plaintiff Apple Inc. as follows: 1. Granting defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs claim of waiver for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; 2. Granting defendant's motion for partial summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs claims that defendant violated § 2 of the Sherman Act (count 5), violated Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 (count 6), and tortiously interfered with contracts (count 13); and 3. Dismissing without prejudice plaintiffs claims against defendant for equitable estoppel (count 1), breach of contract (counts 2, 3 and 4), and declaratory judgment (counts 7, 11 and 12).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?