Curry, Daniel v. Trefz et al

Filing 76

ORDER denying plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/21/2013. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DANIEL RYAN CURRY, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 11-cv-223-slc SGT. REED TREFZ and CAPTAIN DAVID GARDNER, Defendants. Judgment was entered in this case on September 12, 2012 in favor of defendants. On October 12, 2012, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal that I construed to include a request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. I could not determine the amount of plaintiff’s initial partial payment of his filing fee for his appeal because plaintiff had not submitted a trust fund statement. On January 3, 2013, I entered an order giving plaintiff until January 23, 2013, in which to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period from approximately April 12, 2012 to approximately October 12, 2012. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to submit the required trust fund account statement his request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal would be denied. It is now February 21, 2013 and plaintiff has failed to submit his six-month trust fund account statement or show cause for his failure to do so. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied on the ground that he has failed to show that he is entitled to indigent status on appeal. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Daniel Curry’s request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dkt. #71, is DENIED. Further, IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of court insure that plaintiff’s obligation to pay the $455 filing fee for the appeal is reflected in this court’s financial records. Entered this 21st day of February, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?