Hageman, Cynthia v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
ORDER staying plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is to submit information identifying the final decision being challenged, the final decision date or the Appeals Council letter authorizing plaintiff to file a federal action. Amendments to Pleadings due 6/21/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/31/2011. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
CYNTHIA A. HAGEMAN,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Cynthia A. Hageman has filed a civil complaint against the Commissioner of Social
Security.1 She has requested leave to proceed under the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C.
From plaintiff’s affidavit of indigency, I find that because she receives gross annual
income of less than$16,000, she qualifies financially to proceed without prepaying the fees and
costs of filing his action.
The next step is determining whether plaintiff’s proposed action is frivolous or malicious,
fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks money damages from a respondent
who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). In addressing any pro se litigant's
complaint, the court must read the allegations of the complaint generously. Haines v. Kerner, 404
U.S. 519, 521 (1972).
In her complaint, plaintiff states that her disability benefits should have begun in 1999.
She seeks a “complete review and look at since 1999 (April 5th ).” This statement does not
suggest that plaintiff is seeking judicial review of a final decision of the commissioner, as allowed
by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Therefore, before plaintiff may proceed, she must submit more
information. In particular, if indeed plaintiff is contesting a final decision by the commissioner,
In the body of her complaint, plaintiff also lists as defendants the Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, the Attorney General, the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and the United States
District Court of the W estern District of W isconsin. However, the Commissioner of Social Security is the
only proper defendant in an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of a final decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security.
then she must identify the date of the commissioner’s decision. The best way for plaintiff to do
this is to submit a copy of the administrative law judge’s decision or a copy of a letter from the
Appeals Council authorizing her to file a federal action. Alternatively, plaintiff may submit a
letter stating the date on which the final decision in his case was issued and the name of the
person or agency who issued it. Upon receipt of this information, the court will deem it to be
an amendment to the complaint and will recommence its consideration of plaintiff’s application
to proceed in forma pauperis.
The application of Cynthia A. Hageman for permission to proceed in forma pauperis is
STAYED until plaintiff submits information to the court identifying the final decision that she
is challenging and providing the additional information requested above. Plaintiff has until June
21, 2011 in which to submit this information. If she fails to do so, her complaint will be
dismissed for his failure to prosecute it.
Entered this 31st day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
STEPHEN L. CROCKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?