Hageman, Cynthia v. Commissioner of Social Security et al

Filing 6

ORDER that plaintiff may have until August 22, 2011 to show why her complaint should not be dismissed as untimely. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/20/2011. (jef),(ps)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
CYNTHIA A. HAGEMAN,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
11-cv-377-wmc
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

In an order entered on May 31, 2011, I told plaintiff that before the court could consider
her request to proceed in forma pauperis, she would need to submit by June 21, 2011 information
to the court identifying the final decision of the commissioner that she is challenging. On June
30, 2011, I allowed her one more opportunity to submit this information by July 14. 2011.
On July 13, 2011, plaintiff submitted a copy of the Notice of Appeals Council Action,
dated December 2, 2010.

Because her complaint was filed in this court on May 27, 2011,

which is significantly more than 60 days after December 2, 2010, plaintiff’s complaint appears
to be untimely. I will give plaintiff until August 22, 2011 to show why her case should not be
dismissed as untimely.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff may have until August 22, 2011 to show why her
compliant should not be dis missed as untimely. If she fails to respond to this order, her
complaint will be dismissed as untimely..
Entered this 20th day of July, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
STEPHEN L. CROCKER
Magistrate Judge