Clifford, Eleanor v. Mercy Health System Corp. et al
Filing
4
ORDER that this case is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff's refiling her claims in state court. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/20/2011. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEANOR CLIFFORD,
OPINION and ORDER
Plaintiff,
11-cv-548-bbc
v.
MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM CORP.,
RONALD GARCIA, M.D.,
KRISTEN M. GOELZER, M.D. and
KAUSERUZZAMAN A. KAHN, M.D.,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Plaintiff Eleanor Clifford has filed this proposed civil action and has submitted an
affidavit of indigency showing that she may proceed without any prepayment of fees or costs.
Because plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, I must screen her complaint to determine
whether it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or
seeks money damages from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2). After considering plaintiff’s complaint, I find that she is alleging only state law
claims over which this court has no jurisdiction, so I must dismiss this case without
prejudice.
ALLEGATIONS OF FACT
Plaintiff Eleanor Clifford has been a patient of several doctors employed by defendant
1
Mercy Health System Corp.
In the past, plaintiff has sustained “intentional vaccine
injuries,” but Mercy health System has “displayed wanton disregard for the welfare of”
plaintiff by concealing these facts from her.
Plaintiff has been treated by defendants Ronald Garcia and Kristen Goelzer, doctors
employed by defendant Mercy Health System. Garcia and Goeltzer concealed “all true
medical facts and past act(s)” from plaintiff and conspired to “allow the future act[s]” of
“intentional vaccine injury” and “intentional involuntary euthanasia” to plaintiff. Also,
Goeltzer concealed medical information about plaintiff’s sibling Ivy from plaintiff.
Defendant Kauseruzzman Khan, another doctor employed by defendant Mercy
Health System, intentionally falsified a medical report to show that defendant Goelzer was
plaintiff’s primary care physician instead of Khan. Khan then concealed “all true medical
facts and past act(s)” from plaintiff, denied plaintiff access to the “proper level of physician
care specialist” and subjected plaintiff to flu and pneumonia vaccines containing thimerosal,
causing her severe mental injury.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff alleges that defendants have given her harmful medical treatment and kept
medical information from her. Although these allegations are very serious, they amount to
state-law medical malpractice claims, over which this court does not have jurisdiction. This
means that I must dismiss the case without prejudice, but plaintiff remains free to refile her
claims in state court.
2
I note further that in her request for relief, plaintiff asks the court to submit her
complaint “to the grand jury for the purpose of a hearing.” However, federal courts do not
have the authority to order law enforcement officials to conduct investigations into potential
criminal misconduct. "Whether to prosecute and what charge to file or bring before a grand
jury are decisions that generally rest in the prosecutor's discretion."
United States v.
Batchelder, 442 U.S. 114, 124 (1979). If plaintiff seeks a criminal investigation she should
contact law enforcement authorities directly.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiff’s
refiling her claims in state court.
Entered this 20th day of September, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?