Howard, Albert v. Humphries, Robert
Filing
16
ORDER that the order entered September 10, 2015 is AMENDED as follows: The instant petition is STAYED pending exhaustion of petitioner's state remedies on his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim on the following conditions: 1) petitioner must file a habeas corpus petition under State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 484 N.W. 2d 540 (1992), in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals not later than October 26, 2015; and 2) after completely exhausting his state court remedies with respect to his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim, petitioner has 30 days from the date of the last order from the state courts in which to file a motion in this court to lift the stay. If petitioner fails to meet these conditions, then the stay may be vacated nunc pro tunc as of the date of this order and the petition may be dismissed. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/25/2015. (jef/cc: petitioner via U.S. mail),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALBERT L. HOWARD,
ORDER
Petitioner,
11-cv-793-bbc
v.
ROBERT HUMPHREYS, Warden
Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The state has filed a motion seeking clarification of my order entered September 10,
2015, in which I modified an earlier order to reflect that petitioner Albert Howard’s petition
for a writ of habeas corpus would remain in abeyance until he has exhausted his state court
remedies with regard to his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Specifically,
the state asks this court to establish a firm date by which petitioner needs to file a Knight
petition raising his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim in the Wisconsin Court
of Appeals and to specify how long petitioner has following exhaustion of that claim to
notify this court that he has exhausted his state court remedies.
The state’s request is reasonable in order to prevent undue delay in this case.
Accordingly, its motion will be granted.
1
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the order entered September 10, 2015 is AMENDED as
follows:
The instant petition is STAYED pending exhaustion of petitioner’s state remedies on
his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim on the following conditions:
1)
petitioner must file a habeas corpus petition under State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 484
N.W. 2d 540 (1992), in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals not later than October 26, 2015;
and 2) after completely exhausting his state court remedies with respect to his ineffective
assistance of appellate counsel claim, petitioner has 30 days from the date of the last order
from the state courts in which to file a motion in this court to lift the stay. If petitioner fails
to meet these conditions, then the stay may be vacated nunc pro tunc as of the date of this
order and the petition may be dismissed.
Entered this 25th day of September, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
____________________
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?