Porter, Christine v. United States of America et al

Filing 17

Order denying plaintiff's 15 Motion to reopen case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/11/2012. (jef),(ps)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER
12-cv-119-bbc

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
SEROQUEL ASTRAZENECAUS,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER
12-cv-191-bbc

IVAX PHARMACEUTICAL,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER
12-cv-224-bbc

WALGREENS CO. and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICAL,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ADVIAR, BOEHRINGER INGEL HEIM,
FLOVENT, SINGULAIR MSD,
WARRICK BACHERING, XOPENX,
N.H. BOARD MEDICAL PRACTICE and
VT. MEDICAL BOARD PRACTICE,

12-cv-276-bbc

Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
JUDGE CRABB and FLOWVENT,

12-cv-277-bbc

Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL,

12-cv-278-bbc

Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
12-cv-308-bbc
WISCONSIN STATE MEDICAL BOARD,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
12-cv-309-bbc
JAMES GOODSETT, PAUL HICKS,
PHILIP KURLEY, GUPTA PANKHA,
ROD PETERSON, DR. ROWE,
2

JAMES SEHLOFF and L. WILLIAMS,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
12-cv-310-bbc
FLOWVENT,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
12-cv-315-bbc
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
12-cv-316-bbc
JUDGE URBAN,
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRISTINE PORTER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
12-cv-317-bbc
DR. JANJOUR, DR. KINCK,
DR. L. WILLIAMS, DR. WILK and
DR. BEDEKAR,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In a May 9, 2012 order, I dismissed each of the above-captioned cases filed by
plaintiff Christine Porter because each complaint failed to properly state claims upon which
relief could be granted in federal court. Also, to avoid further waste of judicial resources, I

3

directed the clerk of court to route directly to chambers without docketing any further
pleadings plaintiff files in this court in order to verify whether they are comprehensible and
raise claims that could be heard in this court. Now plaintiff has filed a motion to reopen the
cases that states in its entirety, “Motion to reopen show me where one, drug is not toxic.”
As with plaintiff’s other filings, the motion is borderline unintelligible and must be denied.
Rather than continue to file complaints and motions with no chance of success, I strongly
encourage plaintiff to seek the aid of counsel to assist her in her future legal endeavors.

ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Christine Porter’s motion to reopen the abovecaptioned cases is DENIED.
Entered this 11th day of June, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge

4