Goodvine, Christopher v. Hamblin, Gary et al

Filing 286

ORDER that the clerk's office enter David Anstaett of Perkins Coie, as plaintiff's pro bono counsel of record and to set this case for a pretrial conference in June 2014, as the court's schedule allows. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/11/2014. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CHRISTOPHER GOODVINE, ORDER Plaintiff, v. 12-cv-134-wmc GARY ANKARLO, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Christopher Goodvine filed this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, concerning the conditions of his confinement at the Columbia Correctional Institution ("CCI"). At plaintiffs request, the court has recruited counsel David Anstaett of the highly-regarded law firm of Perkins Coie, in Madison, Wisconsin, to represent him pro bono for the remainder of this civil action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(l) ("The court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel."); Prnitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 653-54 (7th Cir. 2007) (en bane) (noting that§ 1915(e)(l) confers, at most, discretion "to recruit a lawyer to represent an indigent civil litigant pro bono publico"). Accordingly, the court will enter his appearance as plaintiffs pro bono counsel for the record. The next step is for the court to hold a status conference to establish a new scheduling order in this case. Plaintiffs counsel should contact the Wisconsin Department of Corrections for purposes of consulting with plaintiff in the preparation of his case whether by phone ancVor in person. So that counsel will have sufficient time to consult with plaintiff in advance of a preliminary pretrial conference, the clerk's office will be directed to set that conference before the undersigned in June 2014, as the court's schedule allows. Finally, plaintiff should appreciate that his counsel took on this representation out of a sense of professional responsibility, which includes representing zealously those clients they take on. Now that he is represented by counsel, plaintiff is advised that in return for representation plaintiff, too, has taken on a responsibility. For example, all future communications with the court must be through his attorney of record. Plaintiff must also work directly and cooperatively with his attorney, as well as those working at his direction, and must permit them to exercise their professional judgment to determine which matters are appropriate to bring to the court's attention and in what form. Plaintiff does not have the right to require counsel to raise frivolous arguments or to follow every directive he makes. On the contrary, plaintiff should expect his counsel to tell him what he needs to hear, rather than what he might prefer to have heard, and understand that the rules of professional conduct may preclude counsel from taking certain actions or permitting him from doing so. Accordingly, plaintiff must be prepared to accept the strategic decisions made by his lawyers even if he disagrees with some of them. If plaintiff decides at some point that he does not wish to work with his lawyers, he is free to alert the court and end their representation, but he should be aware that it is highly unlikely that the court will recruit a second set of attorneys to represent him. 2 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the clerk's office enter David Anstaett of Perkins Coie, as plaintiffs pro bono counsel of record and to set this case for a pretrial conference in June 2014, as the court's schedule allows. Entered this 11th day of April, 2014. BY THE COURT: /s/ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?