Williams, Jessie v. Hamblin, Gary et al
Filing
10
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiffs Leon Irby and Jessie Broadie are considered to have opted out of this lawsuit and are dismissed from this action. Plaintiffs Irby and Broadie will not owe any portion of the $350 filing fee. Plaintiff Jessie Will iam's claims are taken under advisement. As soon as the court's calendar permits, plaintiff's complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/27/2012. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
LEON IRBY, JESSIE WILLIAMS,
JESSIE BROADIE and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.
12-cv-470-bbc
GARY H. HAMBLIN, WILLIAM POLLARD,
DONALD STRAHOTA, JEFFREY GARBELMAN and
GARY ANKARLO,
Defendants.
This is a group action brought by plaintiffs, inmates at the Waupun Correctional
Institution, alleging violations of their constitutional rights. In an order entered in this case on
July 19, 2012, I explained that under Boriboune v. Berge, 391 F.3d 852, 856 (7th Cir. 2004), each
plaintiff is subject to the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and must pay a separate $350 filing fee.
In addition, I cautioned plaintiffs about the consequences of prosecuting this lawsuit in a group
complaint. I gave plaintiffs until July 30, 2012, to advise the court whether each of them wishes
to prosecute this action jointly. In the same order, I gave plaintiffs until July 30 to each submit
a trust fund account statement covering the period from December 28, 2011 to June 28, 2012
so that initial partial payments could be assessed.
In response to the July 19 order, the court has received a letter from plaintiff Irby opting
out of the lawsuit. Plaintiff Williams has submitted the required trust fund account statement
and there has been no response from plaintiff Jessie Broadie.
Because plaintiff Irby does not wish to proceed as a plaintiff in this case, he will be
dismissed from the case without owing a filing fee. In addition, because plaintiff Broadie has not
responded to the court’s order, I will assume that he wishes to be voluntarily withdrawn from
this lawsuit. Accordingly, I will also dismiss Broadie from the case and not charge him any
portion of the $350 filing fee.
From plaintiff Jessie Williams’ trust fund account statement, it appears that he presently
has no means with which to make an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing his
complaint. However, plaintiff Williams should be aware that he is obligated to pay the $350
filing fee, even if this court determines that he will not be permitted to proceed with his
complaint in forma pauperis and even if he does not presently have funds with which to pay the
fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). His account will be monitored and the fee must be taken in
monthly installments when the funds exist. As soon as the court’s calendar permits, plaintiff’s
complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Leave can be denied also if the
complaint does not state a claim on which plaintiff could obtain relief under the law or if
plaintiff is asking for money from a defendant who is legally protected from having to pay
money in his case. Plaintiff will be notified promptly when such a decision has been made.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that
1.
Plaintiffs Leon Irby and Jessie Broadie are considered to have opted out of this
lawsuit and are DISMISSED from the action. Plaintiffs Irby and Broadie will not
owe any portion of the $350 filing fee.
2.
Plaintiff Jessie William’s claims are taken under advisement. As soon as the
court’s calendar permits, plaintiff’s complaint will be screened pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Further, the Clerk of Court is requested to insure that the
2
court’s financial records reflect that plaintiff Williams owes the $350 fee for filing
this case, in accordance with the requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform
Act.
Entered this 27th day of August, 2012
BY THE COURT:
/s/
STEPHEN L. CROCKER
Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?