Williams, Jessie v. Hamblin, Gary et al

Filing 10

ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiffs Leon Irby and Jessie Broadie are considered to have opted out of this lawsuit and are dismissed from this action. Plaintiffs Irby and Broadie will not owe any portion of the $350 filing fee. Plaintiff Jessie Will iam's claims are taken under advisement. As soon as the court's calendar permits, plaintiff's complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/27/2012. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LEON IRBY, JESSIE WILLIAMS, JESSIE BROADIE and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 12-cv-470-bbc GARY H. HAMBLIN, WILLIAM POLLARD, DONALD STRAHOTA, JEFFREY GARBELMAN and GARY ANKARLO, Defendants. This is a group action brought by plaintiffs, inmates at the Waupun Correctional Institution, alleging violations of their constitutional rights. In an order entered in this case on July 19, 2012, I explained that under Boriboune v. Berge, 391 F.3d 852, 856 (7th Cir. 2004), each plaintiff is subject to the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and must pay a separate $350 filing fee. In addition, I cautioned plaintiffs about the consequences of prosecuting this lawsuit in a group complaint. I gave plaintiffs until July 30, 2012, to advise the court whether each of them wishes to prosecute this action jointly. In the same order, I gave plaintiffs until July 30 to each submit a trust fund account statement covering the period from December 28, 2011 to June 28, 2012 so that initial partial payments could be assessed. In response to the July 19 order, the court has received a letter from plaintiff Irby opting out of the lawsuit. Plaintiff Williams has submitted the required trust fund account statement and there has been no response from plaintiff Jessie Broadie. Because plaintiff Irby does not wish to proceed as a plaintiff in this case, he will be dismissed from the case without owing a filing fee. In addition, because plaintiff Broadie has not responded to the court’s order, I will assume that he wishes to be voluntarily withdrawn from this lawsuit. Accordingly, I will also dismiss Broadie from the case and not charge him any portion of the $350 filing fee. From plaintiff Jessie Williams’ trust fund account statement, it appears that he presently has no means with which to make an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing his complaint. However, plaintiff Williams should be aware that he is obligated to pay the $350 filing fee, even if this court determines that he will not be permitted to proceed with his complaint in forma pauperis and even if he does not presently have funds with which to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). His account will be monitored and the fee must be taken in monthly installments when the funds exist. As soon as the court’s calendar permits, plaintiff’s complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Leave can be denied also if the complaint does not state a claim on which plaintiff could obtain relief under the law or if plaintiff is asking for money from a defendant who is legally protected from having to pay money in his case. Plaintiff will be notified promptly when such a decision has been made. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that 1. Plaintiffs Leon Irby and Jessie Broadie are considered to have opted out of this lawsuit and are DISMISSED from the action. Plaintiffs Irby and Broadie will not owe any portion of the $350 filing fee. 2. Plaintiff Jessie William’s claims are taken under advisement. As soon as the court’s calendar permits, plaintiff’s complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Further, the Clerk of Court is requested to insure that the 2 court’s financial records reflect that plaintiff Williams owes the $350 fee for filing this case, in accordance with the requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Entered this 27th day of August, 2012 BY THE COURT: /s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?