McCormack, Alan et al v. Hamblin, Gary et al
Filing
122
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 120 second motion for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/19/2014. (nln),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALAN DAVID McCORMACK,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
12-cv-535-bbc
v.
GARY H. HAMBLIN, Secretary, his Wardens,
Superintendents, Agents, Designees, and any Successors,
COREY BENDER, JODINE DEPPISCH,
KAREN GOURLIE, ANGELA HANSEN,
CATHY A. JESS, FLOYD MITCHELL,
MOLLY S. OLSON, JAMES PARISI,
WELCOME F. ROSE, RENEE SCHUELER
and MARK K. HEISE,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In this civil action, pro se plaintiff Alan David McCormack brought claims that
various prison officials retaliated against him for filing a lawsuit about perceived
overcrowding in Wisconsin prisons by refusing to transfer him to minimum security custody.
In a March 13, 2014 order, I denied plaintiff’s partial motion for summary judgment,
granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and directed the clerk of court to enter
judgment for defendants and close the case. Plaintiff responded by filing a motion to alter
or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), dkt. #116, and a
motion for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, dkt. #118. I denied both of those
1
motions in a May 22, 2014 order. Now plaintiff has filed another Rule 60 motion, dkt.
#120.
There is little reason to provide a detailed point-by-point response to what is now
plaintiff’s third post-judgment motion. Nothing in his new motion persuades me that it was
error to grant defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED
that plaintiff’s second motion for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, dkt. #120,
is DENIED.
Entered this 19th day of June, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?