GARCIA, BERNARDO v. USA

Filing 12

ORDER granting request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis re 7 Notice of Appeal filed by Bernardo Garcia. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/1/12. (krj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER Plaintiff, 05-cr-155-bbc 12-cv-566-bbc v. BERNARDO GARCIA, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On September 24, 2012 I denied defendant Bernardo Garcia’s motion for post conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for his failure to show that either his conviction or sentence is illegal. Defendant filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied on October 8, 2012. Now defendant has filed a notice of appeal as well as an affidavit in support of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. According to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), a defendant who is found eligible for courtappointed counsel in the district court proceedings may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization “unless the district court shall certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith or shall find that the party is otherwise not entitled so to proceed.” 1 Defendant had appointed counsel during the criminal proceedings against him and I do not intend to certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Defendant’s challenge to his sentence is not wholly frivolous. A reasonable person could suppose that it has some merit. Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant Bernardo Garcia’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. Entered this 1st day of November, 2012. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?