Brown, Marvelle v. Schwab, Marilyn
Filing
2
ORDER directing defendant to file a brief on or before August 23, 2012 describing the factual basis and supporting legal argument for removal of this action from the Dane County Circuit Court. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/15/12. (elc),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MARVELLE BROWN,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
12-cv-571-wmc
v.
MARILYN SCHWAB,
Defendant.
The court is in receipt of defendant Marilyn Schwab’s notice of removal. (Dkt.
#1.) Represented by the United States Attorney, defendant contends that removal is
proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), which provides for the removal of civil actions
“[a]gainst officer of the United States or any agency thereof, or person acting under him,
for any act under color of such office or an account of any right, title or authority claimed
under any Act of Congress for . . . the collection of revenue.” The underlying action
involves a claim for harassment between co-workers at the VA Hospital in Madison,
Wisconsin, in which a temporary restraining order was issued to petitioner Brown by the
Dane County Circuit Court against respondent Schwab.
(Dkt. #1-2.) The notice of
removal is devoid of any explanation of the underlying factual or legal basis for invoking §
1442(a)(1).
For example, there is no indication that Schwab (1) is an “officer” or a
“person acting under that officer”; (2) acted “under color of such office”; or (3) acted for
the purpose of the “collection of revenue.”
On the contrary, Marvelle Brown’s
relationship with superiors at the VA Hospital, and the dispute between the parties
described in the State Court petition seems personal in character.
1
As such, the court orders defendant to file a brief on or before Friday, August 23,
2012 describing the factual basis for removal in detail and providing supporting legal
argument.
Entered this 15th day of August, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?