Prouse, Dr. Giorgio v. Thoreson, Robin
Filing
21
ORDER amending 14 Order entered 9/13/2012 to provide that parties' daughter not to be removed from Wisconsin except for horseback riding lessons; briefing set on issue of habitual residence. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/19/12. (krj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GIORGIO PROUSE,
ORDER
Petitioner,
12-cv-644-bbc
v.
ROBIN THORESON,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - At a hearing held on September 18, 2012, the parties presented evidence on the key
issue raised in this case: the parties’ habitual residence. They asked for an opportunity to
brief the issue; the request was granted.
With their briefs, the parties are to submit copies
of the exhibits entered into evidence at the September 18 hearing. In addition, the parties
agreed that the order entered on September 13, 2012 may be amended to permit the parties’
daughter to continue her horseback riding lessons, which take place in Illinois.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the parties are to observe the following briefing schedule:
Petitioner may have until September 25, 2012 in which to file his brief; respondent
may have until October 2, 2102 in which to file a responsive brief; and petitioner may have
until October 5, 2012 in which to file a reply brief.
1
FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED that the order entered on September 13, 2012 is
AMENDED to provide that the parties’ daughter is not to be removed from the state of
Wisconsin except to take part in horseback riding lessons in South Beloit, Illinois. In all
other respects, the order remains as entered on September 13, 2012.
Entered this 19th day of September, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?