Smith, Derrick v. Dickman, Robert et al

Filing 5

ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 20.18 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 11/13/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/22/2012. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE W ESTERN DISTRICT OF W ISCONSIN DERRICK L. SM ITH, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12-cv-741-wmc ROBERT (BOB) DICKM AN, M ELEE THAO, P.A. and M ARATHON COUNTY JAIL M EDICAL STAFF, DEB GLEASON, M EDICAL STAFF 2 JOHN DOE, M ALE NURSES and M EDICAL STAFF JANE DOE, NURSE, Defendants. DERRICK L. SM ITH, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12-cv-742-wmc ROBERT DICKM AN, W ILLIAM W . BEAUDRY, DENNY C. W OODW ARD, GUARD TULLY, R.J. AND OTHER GUARDS, DANIELLE, SUPERVISORS PELLOW SKI, SCHAFFER and OTHER SUPERVISORS, Defendants. DERRICK L. SM ITH, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12-cv-743-wmc ROBERT (BOB) DICKM AN, EDM UND J. JELINSKI, EDM UND J. JELINSKI LAW OFFICE and EDM UND J. JELINSKI INSURANCE COM PANY, Defendants. Plaintiff Derrick Smith, a prisoner at the Dodge Correctional Institution in Waupun, Wisconsin has submitted three proposed complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asks for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because plaintiff is a prisoner, he is subject to the 1996 Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. This means that before this court may decide whether he can proceed with his complaints in forma pauperis, plaintiff will have to make an initial partial payment of the filing fee in each case. In determining whether a prisoner litigant qualifies for indigent status this court applies the formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). According to this formula, a prisoner requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis must prepay 20% of the greater of the average monthly balance or the average monthly deposits made to his prison account in the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. From the trust fund account statement plaintiff has submitted, I calculate his initial partial payment in each case to be $20.18. If plaintiff does not have the money to make the initial partial payments in his regular account, he will have to arrange with prison authorities to pay some or all of the assessments from his release account. This does not mean that plaintiff is free to ask prison authorities to pay all of his filing fees from his release account. The only amount plaintiff must pay at this time is the $20.18 initial partial payment for each case. Before prison officials take any portion of the amounts from plaintiff’s release account, they may first take from plaintiff’s regular account whatever amount up to the full amount plaintiff owes. Plaintiff should show a copy of this order to prison officials to insure that they are aware they should send plaintiff’s initial partial payments to this court. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff Derrick Smith is assessed $20.18 as an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing case no. 12-cv-741-wmc. He is to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $20.18 on or before November 13, 2012. 2. Plaintiff is assessed $20.18 as an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing case no. 12-cv-742-wmc. He is to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $20.18 on or before November 13, 2012. 2 3. Plaintiff is assessed $20.18 as an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing case no. 12-cv-743-wmc. He is to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $20.18 on or before November 13, 2012. 4. If, by November 13, 2012, plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payments or show cause for his failure to do so, he will be held to have withdrawn these actions voluntarily. In that event, the clerk of court is directed to close the files without prejudice to plaintiff’s filing his cases at a later date. Entered this 22nd day of October, 2012. BY THE COURT: /s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?