Jacobs, Dianne v. Owens-Illinois Inc. et al

Filing 35

Order remanding case from MDL. Case reopened. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 11/3/14. (Attachments: # 1 Suggestion of Remand) (rep)

Case MDL No. 875 Document 9795 Filed 11/03/14 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION (NO. VI)

MDL No. 875

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER

The transferee court in this litigation has, in the actions on this conditional remand order: (1) severed
all claims for punitive or exemplary damages; and (2) advised the Panel that coordinated or
consolidated pretrial proceedings with respect to the remaining claims have been completed and that
remand to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. §1407(a), is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims in the action(s) on this conditional remand order
except the severed damages claims be remanded to its/their respective transferor court(s).
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for filing
shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with the
Clerk of the Panel within this 7!day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the
Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record
to be remanded and all necessary copies of any pleadings or other matter filed so as to enable said
Clerk to comply with the order of remand.

FOR THE PANEL:
Nov 03, 2014

_____________________
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel

Case MDL No. 875 Document 9795 Filed 11/03/14 Page 2 of 2

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION (NO. VI)

MDL No. 875

SCHEDULE FOR CRO

TRANSFEREE
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
PAE 2 11−67753
PAE 2 12−60004
PAE 2 13−60011

TRANSFEROR
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
ALS 2 11−00444
WIE 1 11−00497
WIW 3 12−00899

PAE

2

13−60013

WIW

3

13−00250

PAE

2

13−60019

WIW

3

13−00459

CASE CAPTION
KITE v. BILL VANN COMPANY, INC.10/31/14*
et al
Opposed
SPYCHALLA v. AVCO CORPORATION et al
JACOBS v. OWENS−ILLINOIS INC. et al
ZICKERT v. BAYER CROP SCIENCE INC. et
al
HECKEL v. 3M COMPANY et al

*ALS 2:11-cv-00444* The transferee court has informed the Panel that Cummins, Inc., should have been included in the list of
viable defendants that appears on page 2 of the Suggestion of Remand.