O'Dell, Jerry v. Watters, Steve et al
Filing
4
ORDER directing plaintiff to submit a six-month resident account statement by 1/25/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/3/2013. (elc),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JERRY O’DELL,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
12-cv-948-bbc
v.
STEVE WATTERS, DEB McCULLOCH,
KAY MORSE, STEPHANIE ARMITAGE and
JANET FAIT,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Jerry O’Dell, a patient at the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, has filed a
proposed complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his constitutional rights. In
addition, he has submitted a motion and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees and
costs.
This court uses one method for determining the indigent status of all institutionalized
persons, even those like plaintiff who are not subject to the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act.
See Longbehn v. United States, 169 F.3d 1082 (7th Cir. 1999). From a six-month resident account
statement covering the full six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the plaintiff’s
complaint, the court calculates two amounts, 20% of the plaintiff’s average monthly income and
20% of the plaintiff’s average monthly balance. Whichever amount is greater is the amount the
plaintiff will have to prepay toward the $350 filing fee. He will qualify for indigent status with
respect to the remainder of the fee. (The in forma pauperis statute does not permit a court to
waive entirely a plaintiff’s obligation to pay filing fees. All it does is allow a court to grant
qualifying individuals leave to proceed without prepaying some or all of the filing fee.)
In his motion, plaintiff states that he has no source of income and does not possess any
cash, accounts, real estate, stocks, bonds, security notes, automobiles or other property of any
value. Nevertheless, plaintiff will have to provide a copy of his six-month resident account
statement if he intends to pursue his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because
plaintiff’s complaint was submitted on December 20, 2012, his resident account statement
should cover the period beginning approximately June 20, 2012 and ending approximately
December 20, 2012. If plaintiff fails to submit the required statement within the deadline set
below, I will assume he does not wish to proceed with this action and this case will be closed.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff may have until January 25, 2013, in which to submit a
certified copy of his resident account statement beginning approximately June 20, 2012 and
ending approximately December 20, 2012. If, by January 25, 2013, plaintiff fails to submit the
required statement or show cause of his failure to do so, I will assume that he wishes to withdraw
this action voluntarily and, in that case, the clerk of court is directed to close this file without
prejudice to plaintiff’s filing his case at a later date.
Entered this 3rd day of January, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
STEPHEN L. CROCKER
Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?